Beat Juggling - Page 2
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 25

Thread: Beat Juggling

  1. #11
    DJTT Infectious Moderator photojojo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Sherman, TX
    Posts
    13,925

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sidetrakd View Post
    You would probably stick to a rehearsed pattern but with different sounds so there's no reason for it to work out with on the fly sounds
    Do you mean not to work out?

    And the whole point is you're not playing a rehearsed pattern, but more like just jamming on the drums. It's probably impractical to think you could set the cue points live as that really takes to much time I think. Even if you've got 8 set cue points and you're playing them similar to the way you would just jam on the drums without rehearsing a specific routine has got to get more respect than tic-tac-toe.
    Chris Jennings FHP

    Podcast - Soundcloud - Mixcloud - Beatport Charts - x

  2. #12
    amidoinitrite
    Guest

    Default

    IMO..
    cueing on the fly and banging out a beat is still a lot easier than beat juggling.
    Also, i think it will take a lot less time to come up with a good routine via cue points, than actual vinyls.

    I'm not saying one is better than the other..
    digitally, it seems like you have more options.. you get 8 samples a track, and can basically do anything in any order down to 32nd notes (more or less depending on your ability) and obviously you can delete and re cue on the fly if you have to.
    Vinyl.. you are more free(not limited to 8 samples at a time) but navigating between different samples is a lot more difficult and takes up more time, and also 32nd notes with varying hits/samples is going to be quite the challenge. But you have more option of manipulating the sound on the fly.. reverse, slowing it down, scratching, etc.

    I guess the point I'm trying to make is that they are totally different skills.

    when I hear beat juggling done digitally I think.. bouncing between 2 (or more) tracks and making a choppy beat. Not triggering cues as samples on a single deck!

  3. #13
    DJTT Infectious Moderator photojojo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Sherman, TX
    Posts
    13,925

    Default

    Cue juggling is definitely easier, but doing it well is not easy. Or at least as easy as some might think. How many times do we get old school vinyl guys on here that are trying out controllers, but can't figure out something that we might take for granted?

    The skill sets are different, but a good digital DJ that can manipulate music like a turntabelist does is still largely reliant on being able to "feel" certain things, having the correct timing and talent in general.
    Chris Jennings FHP

    Podcast - Soundcloud - Mixcloud - Beatport Charts - x

  4. #14
    Tech Guru sarasin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Cape Town
    Posts
    5,079

    Default

    Common Denominator?

    PRACTICE!

    They both need practice!

    APC80:STR8-100's+Ortofon Concorde Scratch\Electro:ButterRugz:TSP2-NI Audio4DJ:Xone22+Innofader:MacBook Pro 15"
    www.soundcloud.com/djsarasin
    www.youtube.com/adriansarasin

  5. #15
    Tech Guru
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    1,063

    Default

    I usually do a lot on the fly, i have a 32 beat jump button so usually play a song and then set the next on my cue points so i can lengthen it etc whilst going along, recently fixed my nanopad so ready to rock and roll again just need a new usb hub
    *Samsung rv 511, 8gb ram, core i5 processor* *Samsung netbook 2gb ram* *Traktor pro 2* *Traktor s4* *midi fighter spectra* *audio technica ath-m50x* *m audio trigger finger pro* *ableton* *fl studio* and a load of other random bits and pieces.... plus I like bacon yo.

  6. #16
    Tech Mentor oneapemob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Barcelona
    Posts
    199

    Default

    Sarasin is right, the important thing is practice in both cases, but beat juggling is a skill that takes an awful lot of time to learn.

    Consider this, with vinyls you have a lot of stuff you need to work out just to be able to do a back to back on the same song :
    - weight of the cartridge
    - depth of the groove in the vinyl
    - is the vinyl warped
    - humidity of the room ( seems silly i know, but if it's humid, then the slipmat won't slip like you are used to )
    Rewinding the record every time in the same way is real difficult, doing it on time even more, doing it repeatedly on time with two vinyls takes an insane amount of practice ( i'm not saying cue dĦjuggling doesn't).

    But the creative part between cue and beat juggling is the same, you work on it till you are more capable of coming up with ideas ( prepared or on the fly ), the timing thing is the same, i don't care that you use vinyl or cue points, if you don't have the groove, if you aren't on time, it doesn't matter, it's failed.

    The difference is i have never seen a cue point skip
    macbook pro, technics trntbl, numark pro sm-1, vestax pmc 08 pro, traktor scratch pro 2, akai mpd 24, novation nocturn, vci-100 fw1.4, krk rp5g2 and FBV express mk2

  7. #17
    Tech Mentor The Vly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    186

    Default

    What Photojojo said: I think they really are 2 different skill sets, kind of like comparing apples to oranges.

    That said, I think if you grabbed 2 DJs (one who has only spun vinyl and one who has only ever played digitally), I think the digital DJ would have a harder time learning to beat juggle than the vinyl DJ learning to cue juggle.
    "Listening to Techno without bass is like trying to get yourself off without using your hands."
    My music blog: www.thevlyhouse.com

  8. #18
    Moderator keithace's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    5,239

    Default

    chess and tic tac toe is not a fair comparison...apples and oranges is right...they are both good...and different...and some like one but not the other...and vice versa...
    Weapons, not food, not homes, not shoes
    Not need, just feed the war cannibal animal

  9. #19
    Tech Guru sobi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    1,130

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by photojojo View Post
    Cue juggling is definitely easier, but doing it well is not easy.
    I don't see it like that at all. If you have a good ear, and know your track/tracks, all thats left is to mash buttons. There isn't nearly as much hand/eye coordination as there is with regular juggling. I honestly can't even believe that they are being compared.

  10. #20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Vly View Post
    What Photojojo said: I think they really are 2 different skill sets, kind of like comparing apples to oranges.

    That said, I think if you grabbed 2 DJs (one who has only spun vinyl and one who has only ever played digitally), I think the digital DJ would have a harder time learning to beat juggle than the vinyl DJ learning to cue juggle.
    I agree.

    Vinyl is not accurate in terms of beat consistency. Riding the pitch is what prevents a train wreck. A person, who played vinyl before Traktor came into the market, will more than likely mix as if they were playing Technics 1200s.

    Cue Juggling is merely timing which, is standard with those who mix vinyl.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •