Does Traktor's master gain have any effect on recording gain?
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Tech Mentor Sn0wday's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    201

    Default Does Traktor's master gain have any effect on recording gain?

    I know you should record at ~-10dB, does it matter what the master gain is if i'm recording internally and have the recording gain set -10dB? I had both at -10 but didn't know if that would make the entire thing REALLY quiet.

  2. #2
    Tech Guru Zaniac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Gold Coast, Australia
    Posts
    860

    Default

    where did you get -10db from?

    I have my mix recorder (internal) set at -3 and my master set at 12 o'clock
    "Wow! I wanna be just like your friend! Thats honestly what i told my mom and dad when i was about 11 years old...i said when i grow up i wanna dj for rich people"

  3. #3
    DJTT Administrator del Ritmo padi_04's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Argentina
    Posts
    6,553

    Default

    Nope, the internal recorder has it's own gain knob.

  4. #4
    DJTT Moderator Dude Jester's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Noiseeland
    Posts
    12,426

    Default

    just keep both levels out of the red.
    Acer E5 i7 16GB 512SSD 2TBHD ~ WIN 10 ~ TSP 2.11 ~ AUDIO 6 ~ DUAL X1s ~ DN-X1600 ~ SPECTRA ~ TWISTER ~ ATH-PRO500 MK2 ~ ZED6FX ~ AT2020

    " I’m the Dude, so that’s what you call me. That or, uh His Dudeness, or uh Duder, or El Duderino, if you’re not into the whole brevity thing. "

  5. #5
    Tech Guru mostapha's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    4,748

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rgtb View Post
    that's half of the story. the other half of the story is that peak levels in the audio recorder should reach close to 0dBFS. i mean, if your peaks are at -3dBFS, it's probably nothing to worry about. but if your peaks are at -20 or -25dBFS, you're wasting bit resolution.
    That's really not that big of a concern. You don't want to record at -70dB or anything crazy because there's no reason, but there are 3 big players in this.

    1. Modern music is really compressed. You only need a few bits worth of dynamic range to represent everything except fades to silence. That matters if you're recording instruments…but it's not as big of a deal for full tracks.
    2. The general rule of thumb is that 6dBFS = 1 bit (for integer representations…floating point numbers work differently). But that's based on full spectrum audio (white noise). 1 bit can represent a good bit more dynamic range than that for anything that isn't white noise…which depends a lot on the frequency content of the music.
    3. Traktor uses 32-bit flaot representations internally…which have a noise floor that's basically inaudible (around -1500dB).


    What that means is that you can run your Master wherever the hell you like it (goal: don't clip) and amp your final output after the DAC to get it to a reasonable level. I did a set on Traktor at -40dBFS just for the heck of it. The difference wasn't audible.

    Your recording level should be reasonable, but if you're recording a 24-bit file…peaking at -10dB or -20dB is much better than aiming at -3dB and clipping when you boost an EQ knob a bit too much. Even at 16-bit, it's fine. Read this and pay attention to the section on dynamic range a couple pages down.

    Because of the way digital audio and the human ear works, 16-bit audio can record things a lot quieter than -96dB. He makes a legit claim that -120dB is a much closer figure, and as he shows, "120dB is greater than the difference between a mosquito somewhere in the same room and a jackhammer a foot away.... or the difference between a deserted 'soundproof' room and a sound loud enough to cause hearing damage in seconds."

    That's what you're working with.

    10 or 20dB at the top doesn't matter, and my experiments have borne this out in practice.

    "As loud as you can without clipping" died with tape. Especially if you're recording in the box and not going through converters, the only thing that really matters is "don't clip." If you can see it on the meter, you can record it. Yeah…when you master/normalize it, you'll be amplifying the noise floor…but Traktor's noise floor is inaudible anyway. As long as you're using something modern for your mastering/normalizing, everything should be fine.

    One recent interesting realization from these experiments: Maschine's panning doesn't go to -infinity. If you pan a sound hard left…the right side still carries the full signal. If you host it in a DAW set to use 32-bit float numbers…neither one has a nose floor to speak of. Adding around 150dB of gain to the right side of a stereo signal panned hard left that should be silent gives you the right side of the original…in what seems to be perfect fidelity.

    That basically means that Maschine can output at around -150dBFS and as long as you're getting it's 32-bit float internal representation out of it and your gain stage is perfectly clean (which DAW gain utilities are)…the signal seems like it's still perfect.

    It really makes me wonder why Trakor defaults to playing everything so loud. The only thing that really matters is not clipping your sound card outputs and having a quiet enough gain stage after the DAC to get it up to a reasonable level before it hits the amplifiers.
    Last edited by mostapha; 06-13-2012 at 11:09 AM.

  6. #6
    Tech Guru mostapha's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    4,748

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rgtb View Post
    traktor's internal representation is irrelevant in this context. the relevant signal which the audio recorder records is a quantized 16-bit integer signal. if you set the gain in the audio recorder such that your highest peak is -18dBFS, then you're throwing away 3-bit of resolution. the three most significant bits of each sample will be zero, *always*.
    That's not entirely correct. Traktor's internal representation is relevant because it allows you to use completely different levels for recording and output, which was part of the point of this thread.

    One clarification…you're not losing the most significant bits…you're losing the least significant bits (the ones that get cut off below the noise floor of digital audio). When you then master or normalize the recording, you wind up turning those bottom 3 bits into noise either from your mastering processors or from the normalization algorithm…both of which probably don't actually add noise…but let's pretend they do and that the noise is completely uncorrelated to the audio. That means that the loudest possible signal of the noise in those 3 bits is 0x0008 out of 0xFFFF (a ratio of .000107).

    Now, when we're actually playing the audio, it has to go through a DAC and get converted to an analog voltage signal. The math gets weird here, and it's entirely possible that I'm doing something wrong. If there's an electrical engineer out there that can correct me, please do. The actual numbers (sample values) involved in 16-bit digital audio (0x0000 to 0xFFFF) are linearly related to output voltage, which is (eventually) linearly related to speaker movement and sound pressure. Your ears hear logorithmically, and that's how the dBFS scale works too.

    In a Studio:

    AES standard calibration gives 0dBFS = +24dBu = 1.22 V. (comes from +4 dBu = -20 dBFS reference level for studio equipment)
    Your noise (representing .000107 of Full Scale) is at .000107 * 1.22 = 0.00013 V = 0.13 mV = -75.5 dBu.
    So, the noise is actually about 100dB quieter than your peak.

    That's really quiet. And, it actually makes sense if you take that article as true and the dynamic range of 16-bit audio actually is more like 120dB than 96dB. I love it when things are internally consistent.

    So, is it ideal? Probably not. But it's about as loud as someone trying to talk to you in a normal voice while operating a chainsaw without earplugs.

    Quote Originally Posted by rgtb View Post
    however, i do conjecture scenarios exist where you can ABX between a recording made at close to 0dBFS and a recording at -40dBFS which we later bring up to the same volume as the first recording. in the end, it's an empirical question. you need to do ABX tests.
    If you're recording in 16-bit…yes. But no one would do that unless they didn't have any other choice…which you never do. All it's telling me is never to bother with Traktor's internal recording. But still…16-bit audio is plenty wide for this type of recording.

    Quote Originally Posted by rgtb View Post
    today's productions are compressed a lot and they are clipped a lot. we're in the late stage of the loudness war. the stuff mastering engineers do will bring up productions' noise floor. once again, i'm not sure what that means for us as DJs.
    For recording…it's simple.

    Don't clip.

    That's basically it. You don't want your RMS level to be -50 dBFS. So don't be crazy. But you don't need to jump through hoops and make sure you know where your peaks are to make sure that you're getting a recording as loud as you can without clipping. Just turn it down enough to make sure you don't clip and don't worry about it. Peaking at -5dB is probably fine.

  7. #7
    Tech Guru mostapha's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    4,748

    Default

    That's not quantization noise. Quantization errors come out of how bit depth and sampling frequency interact. You "fight" it by adding virtually inaudible noise (dithering)., which traktor doesn't do.

    -50 is absurd, but I still think keeping your levels around -18 is a better choice than right around 0.

  8. #8
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    4

    Default Amplify

    Hey I've been recording at around -10 db through my s4 which is obviously too quiet to upload to soundcloud as a final product... How do I amplify it to the standard sound level without clipping?

  9. #9
    Tech Wizard
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    97

    Default

    Once a mix is recorded just normalise it in your favourite editor. If you used vinyl and had any pops/clicks it might be worth dealing with those first as they will affect your overall peak after normalising significantly, but otherwise I set it to peak at -0.1dB then have lunch.
    Last edited by niknok; 06-12-2014 at 06:47 PM.

  10. #10
    Tech Wizard
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    40

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sn0wday View Post
    I know you should record at ~-10dB, does it matter what the master gain is if i'm recording internally and have the recording gain set -10dB? I had both at -10 but didn't know if that would make the entire thing REALLY quiet.
    Short answer (which I don't think was ever specifically addressed) is that yes it does. The master gain (main level knob on the top center of an S4 controller) will also control the input to the audio recorder, which you then further adjust with it's separate gain knob.

    This allows those who routinely mix live with levels out in the red (which won't clip) to record without going into the red on the audio recorder (which definitely will clip).

    If you are recording a mix of finished tracks that have already been mastered, recording at -10dB is really a non issue. Just set gains so the L&R meters in the audio recorder are not in the red, or (as I do) just kissing it at times.

    Quote Originally Posted by Mhseely0507
    Hey I've been recording at around -10 db through my s4 which is obviously too quiet to upload to soundcloud as a final product... How do I amplify it to the standard sound level without clipping?
    As you've probably noticed, no one will play your tracks on Soundcloud unless they're really loud. It's just the way it goes... anyway you'll be fine as long as you run your recorder up but not hitting the red more than just for an instant at times. To check, load a test track into a deck of S4, grid it (whether you usually do this or not) and then examine the waveform in expanded view in the large deck linear window. It's pretty accurate. You don't need anything other than S4.

    FWIW I'm a working club DJ who mixes almost completely with my own 2 to 2 1/2 minute custom remixes and edits, and most of those I've put together with just S4. I've done over 600 of them, and posted some of them on Soundcloud with no issues.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •