Mixed In Key 5.5 beta - Page 4
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 31 to 36 of 36
  1. #31

    Default

    showed nothing higher than an 8 for me, so not sure if this is a good or bad ideal . but its just a tool and not going to tell the dance floor you should be dancing this song is a 10 lol

  2. #32
    Tech Guru Timbo21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    It's Britainy Bitch
    Posts
    561

    Default

    Initially I thought this was just a rubbish idea, but I was recently thinking of putting my music into folders, such as warm up material, mid-vide, and full on stonkers. Obviously tagging them in this way could be a way of doing this without putting them into folders.

    Might try it and see if I get an 11

  3. #33

    Default

    Not sure why this would bother anyone. It's a cool feature that they added to a useful program that you can completely ignore if you don't find it useful...
    2 x CDJ 850 | Kontrol S4 | A&H Xone XD-53's | A&H Xone K2 | Kontrol X1 | Kontrol F1 | DJM 900nxs

  4. #34
    DJTT Infectious Moderator photojojo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Sherman, TX
    Posts
    13,925

    Default

    That's how I got where I am today. Well minus the illegal downlands, parents money and all the computer stuff.
    Chris Jennings FHP

    Podcast - Soundcloud - Mixcloud - Beatport Charts - x

  5. #35
    Tech Guru DJ SB's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    771

    Default

    Ya I am just a little tired of another aspect of DJing getting 'automated' every month it seems. C'est la vie..

  6. #36
    Tech Guru Timbo21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    It's Britainy Bitch
    Posts
    561

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DJ SB View Post
    Ya I am just a little tired of another aspect of DJing getting 'automated' every month it seems. C'est la vie..
    I can't really think of why to use it unless I couldn't remember what the track was without a little listen, which is perfectly plausible when working with a large collection, and I was after a track with a certain level of energy. Certainly would save time.

    Anyway, purely Dj'ing by numbers isn't gonna work, but I could imagine some young noobs trying

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •