wow, it's been YEARS since I have seen or even used a serato box and I forgot how HUGE the box is... it is so much easier to have a mixer with a built in interface... the external interfaces and extra cables are a pain
wow, it's been YEARS since I have seen or even used a serato box and I forgot how HUGE the box is... it is so much easier to have a mixer with a built in interface... the external interfaces and extra cables are a pain
--> (2) Technics 1200 mk2, (1) Technics 1200 m3d, (1) Technics 1200 mk5, Pioneer DJM-S9, Rokit 5 Monitors, BX8 Monitor, TSP2, SDJ, DJP4M (DjProForMac), 2015 Macbook Pro (Quad Core i7 2.5ghz, 16GB RAM, 2GB AMD-R9, 1GB SSD) <--
SL2 is much smaller, sl1 is so big because of the mic input
DJM800 | 2xCDJ2000 | RMX1000 | Adidas HD25's
2011 MBP | Traktor 2.6 | Kontrol S4 | Scratch Live | SL2
Mac Pro | Ableton | Access Virus C | Maschine
Facebook || Soundcloud || Twitter
My dilemma on deciding on either is portability. Totally agree the box is a pain and having it integrated is much less hassle....but what about when there's no SSL mixer available? Then you need the box...so might as while have the box regardless?
I use traktor so this isn't really an issue...BUT... I do have serato downloaded on my computer (FREE DOWNLOAD)...and I still setup crates, cue points, and build overviews just in case I have to use serato for a gig... but most the time if that's the case the serato box is already at the venue...if not I just borrow from a buddy of mine
--> (2) Technics 1200 mk2, (1) Technics 1200 m3d, (1) Technics 1200 mk5, Pioneer DJM-S9, Rokit 5 Monitors, BX8 Monitor, TSP2, SDJ, DJP4M (DjProForMac), 2015 Macbook Pro (Quad Core i7 2.5ghz, 16GB RAM, 2GB AMD-R9, 1GB SSD) <--
|
Bookmarks