Whats your favorite tape emulation VST?
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15
  1. #1
    Dr. Bento BentoSan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    6,383

    Default Whats your favorite tape emulation VST?

    Hey guys,

    Keen on trying out some different tape emulations, i have been using PSP Vintage Warmer pretty much exclusivly (which i <3) but wouldnt mind trying out some others.

    For those who are wondering what tape emulation is i recommend reading this article on wikipedia:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reel-to...tape_recording

    Even today, many artists of all genres prefer analog tape's "musical", "natural" and especially "warm" sound. Due to harmonic distortion, bass can thicken up, creating the illusion of a fuller-sounding mix. In addition, high end can be slightly compressed, which is more natural to the human ear. It is common for artists to record to digital and re-record the tracks to analog reels for this effect of "natural" sound. In addition to all of these attributes of tape, tape saturation is a unique form of distortion that many rock and blues artists find very pleasing.
    The hotter your run the signal onto the tape the more of this tape saturation that you get, personally i think it sounds really nice and adds a really pleasant sound to a mix. Very useful as as insert effect(sounds mint on basslines or drums) or on your master channel.

    The only issue i find with PSP vintage wamer 2 is the huge amount of plugin latency that it has This makes it unusable for a live performance or if your doing your production recording in lots of automation from your midi controllers. PSP Vintage Wamer LE (basically a low latency version of PSP vintage warmer 1) however has a lower latency but doesnt have the nice options that PSP VW2 has like the totally awesome fat mode which is total awesomeness.

    Off topic: Looking forward to getting this production section of the forums off the ground, i think we can turn it into a really good resource with enough work Props to anyone who contributes and helps get it going strong. Its kinda a case of use it or lose it, if this section dies off then these threads will close up this section of the forum and put it back into the General section, which would be a shame ! I will certainly be doing what i can to contribute my knowledge here and do my best get this off the ground so hopefully it doesnt come to that.
    Last edited by BentoSan; 09-26-2009 at 03:41 PM.

  2. #2
    Tech Guru
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    2,597

    Default

    I used to have this neat plugin called ThrillMe that i'd use on almost all my tracks. I'm just in the process of rebuilding my digital studio again for the 3rd time in 5 years (ughhh groan....) so gotta get a new copy.

    I'm getting back into production very seriously now, I'm even putting the djing thing on the backburner until I get some real progress done with my original music and remix work. So suffice to say I'll be a regular in this new section, so far it's off to a good start i'd say. Good on you for getting this thing goin Bento!

  3. #3

  4. #4
    Tech Guru sj03w4t's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Home
    Posts
    854

    Default

    interesting...
    Is it not possible to do 'manually' what the wikipedia article says? as in:
    Quote Originally Posted by wikip.
    .. bass can thicken up, creating the illusion of a fuller-sounding mix. In addition, high end can be slightly compressed..
    By somehow splitting the audio signal into 3 signals (lo-mid-hi) and applying a compressor to the high signal and some sort of effect to the lo signal for 'fatter' bass..
    Advantage is that you might have more parameters to control with this setup..

    lolz... just looked at the vintage site and it already has alot of parameters.. ^^fail

  5. #5
    Tech Guru Fatlimey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Redmond, WA
    Posts
    1,169

    Default

    In my car, I currently run the output of my cellphone through a pre-amp into one of these:



    and it does some great poor-man's-compression on the signal. Sounds way better than you might imagine, mainly due to amplifying _before_ sending through the tape.

    You could use the same thing on your live output. As real-time as it gets!

  6. #6

    Default

    ..did anybody even think of clicking the pic i´ve posted above

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by compact View Post
    ..did anybody even think of clicking the pic i´ve posted above
    I did lol thx

  8. #8
    DJTT Ninja Mod tekki's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Afterhour Ali's lap
    Posts
    11,358

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by compact View Post
    ..did anybody even think of clicking the pic i´ve posted above
    Imagining very hard, that I did not read it.
    RSTRCTD | twitter | facebook (RSTRCTD) facebook (LJ) | vimeo | pinterest | my studio | soundcloud (RSTRCTD)| soundcloud (LJ)
    -- CHECK our DEBUT (DEEP)HOUSE EP RELEASE ON BEATPORT "RSTRCTD - EXISTENCE" --

  9. #9
    Tech Guru
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    2,597

    Default

    i have a question for you guys.

    do you just use tape emulation for the master bus track?

    or do you apply tape emulation to indivdual track parts like drums/percussion, bassline, lead, pad, vocal etc. ???

    what gives the best results?

  10. #10

    Default Re: Whats your favorite tape emulation VST?

    Quote Originally Posted by sj03w4t
    interesting...
    Is it not possible to do 'manually' what the wikipedia article says? as in:
    .. bass can thicken up, creating the illusion of a fuller-sounding mix. In addition, high end can be slightly compressed..
    By somehow splitting the audio signal into 3 signals (lo-mid-hi) and applying a compressor to the high signal and some sort of effect to the lo signal for 'fatter' bass..
    Advantage is that you might have more parameters to control with this setup..

    lolz... just looked at the vintage site and it already has alot of parameters.. ^^fail
    yeah tape emulation is quite complex and still doesn't come 100% to sounding like actual tape. when people say that tape gives a "warmer" sound to it, what that actually is is noise in the background. this type of machine noise is obviously eliminated in digital production, and the result is what someo people refer to as "dry". all it really is is a cleaner signal. cool thought.

    @duerr - tbh I don't use tape emus on a lot but there are occasions when i do. I thought I'd give a thought on it though: drums with an analog feel would be pretty cool if mixed right with pads/synths with no emu on them I think. that way you're kind of mixing the digital/analog styles together , almost giving it a feel like the drums were sampled or recorded live (and somewhere expensive where they offer tape recording still :P)
    soundcloud.com/hpntk / soundcloud.com/freakstep
    freakstep.com / thefreakbeat.com
    me on beatport / me on djtunes
    Quote Originally Posted by JesterNZDJ
    My solution: Pay some one to whack them so you don't have any competition

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •