Trimming a mastered WAV without losing quality
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15
  1. #1

    Default Trimming a mastered WAV without losing quality

    I ran into a peculiar problem. I created a track for mastering with a bit of silence before the track. The track sounded great after mastering. I wanted to trim the silent bit out in Ableton, however, when I drop the WAV in, the sound quality significantly decreases.

    Any ideas what's going on?

    What's a safe way to trim the WAV without messing up the quality?

  2. #2
    Tech Mentor deathy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    356

    Default

    Don't use Ableton, use an actual audio editor rather than a DAW... like, Soundforge, Audacity, something like that. For the record - I cannot attest to Audacity for this, as it is an audio editor with some DAW-like features, and I haven't measured it... but SF is solid for this sorta thing.

    So long as your editor works on the audio in its original sample format (bitrate, frequency, etc.), then WAV is a lossless format and you should be fine. However, if you load it into Ableton and most other DAWs, then it internally works at 32 bit, possibly higher frequency, yadda yadda yadda.

    Shifting your sample format like this can introduce artifacts, and Ableton is notoriously horrible at coloring your audio as well (for example, consolidate actually changes the sound... was chatting with Warp9 about it, and ran an actual test to verify it, and yeah... consolidate is freakin' BAD in Ableton, you should never use it). Your experience with other DAWs may vary, but for the most part, they are not the best choice for minor edits like cropping.

  3. #3
    Tech Guru Tarekith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Luxembourg
    Posts
    888

    Default

    Ableton is fine for this, just turn off warping for the song when you drag it into the app. When you're done, make sure you have dither turned off in the render dialogue too. It's no different from any other wave editing app at that point, at least in terms of sound quality.

  4. #4
    Tech Mentor deathy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    356

    Default

    Tarekith - Actually, the internal sample format shift will still introduce some artifacts to the process that you might want to avoid after you've mastered it. This is measurable. If you want the exact same untrimmed bytes out that you put in, you can't use Ableton.

  5. #5
    Tech Guru Tarekith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Luxembourg
    Posts
    888

    Default

    What sample format shift? I've never even heard that term before, can you clarify a little so I can understand?

  6. #6
    Tech Mentor markyyoung's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    South Padre Island, TX
    Posts
    132

    Default

    Yeah I would use Audacity for something like this.
    One feeds the pocket, the other feeds the soul "DJ Mpire"

  7. #7
    Tech Mentor deathy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    356

    Default

    By sample format shift, what I mean is that internally, Ableton works in 32 bit whereas the master is probably 16 bit, and maybe a higher sample frequency than your master's (though that is probably less likely).

    Once you've got your final master, if you load it into Ableton, it will shift back into 32 bit, then when you export, it's back to 16 bit, you will not have the exact same bytes that you fed into it (and I'm of coz not counting the ones you trimmed). Even with warping off, you're still probably going to add a little bit of color to your sound.

    Whether or not it's audible to most people is a different question entirely, but I personally would think it's worth tryin' to keep your master as clean as possible.

    That said, my understanding is that a master should have a little bit of leading silence... though I don't know how much you are wanting to trim, Uni. Redbook, which isn't exactly important any more, actually wants a 2s gap... but that could mostly go at the end. A short bit of lead in for your transient, of coz, but that doesn't really need to be very much. I usually make the lead-in about .5s myself, though that isn't anything I've specifically measured or any such thing, just what seems OK to me.

  8. #8
    Tech Guru Tarekith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Luxembourg
    Posts
    888

    Default

    I'm sorry, but that's just not true. I just tested this in Live 9.5. Took a 16bit song, duplicated it to a new track and cut off a minute at the end. Exported the edited song at 16bit with no dither, and it phase cancels 100% with the original 16bit version I started with.

    I'm not saying Live is the best tool for things like this, but it can be used too if that's all the OP has. You can find more info on what operations in Live are nuetral or not in the audio fact sheet they have posted on the site:

    https://www.ableton.com/en/manual/audio-fact-sheet/

  9. #9
    Tech Mentor deathy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    356

    Default

    I retract, thanks, Tarekith.

    Note to Uni - Tarekith mentioned that you must disable the dithering in the export if you want it to be seamless (as well as his original statement to turn off warping, of coz). Don't forget to do that.

  10. #10
    Tech Guru Tarekith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Luxembourg
    Posts
    888

    Default

    No worries man. A lot of people have this notion that Live is messing with their audio more than it really is, I just want to see them get more credit for being sound-focused too

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •