Bit Accurate gets closer to the metal, so there's a little bit less overhead, and you can get slightly better latency on lower end systems. But jesus, is 5ms (128 samples) not enough?
Bit Accurate gets closer to the metal, so there's a little bit less overhead, and you can get slightly better latency on lower end systems. But jesus, is 5ms (128 samples) not enough?
A&H Xone:96 | Xone:K1 | 2 x 1210s | Traktor Pro 3 | Apple Macbook Pro (2015) 13" | Sennheiser HD7 DJ | Maschine Mikro Mk3
read: http://djworx.com/author/dan-morse
talk: http://facebook.com/bleeptechno
listen: http://mixcloud.com/bleephudds
- Equipment - 2X Technics 1200, 2X Audio Technica ATLP1240, 2X XDJ700, 2X XDJ1000 MK2, Denon DNX-1100, Mixars DUO, DJM750 MK2, NI Audio 10, NI Aduio 4, Serato SL3, 4X Shure M44-7, 2X Ortofon Pro S, 2X Numark Groove Tool, Maschine MK3, Samson Carbon 49, Roland SE-02, Novation Launchcontrol, TouchOSC, Nocation Peak, Arturia MiniBrute, Korg Volca Kick, MicroKorg (Classic), NI Komplete Audio 6
Not really, it's THEIR words, I quoted in the very first post:
"Although the Xone:23C is class compliant and will work on a Mac without drivers, for best performance we
recommend you download the dedicated drivers from our website"
In addition the 23C manual states:
"Bit accurate
-
in this mode the Xone:23C controls the
audio clocks and provides the lowest latency and least
jitter. We recommend working in this mode for best
performance"
But nevermind, I understand A&H are the right address to ask.
|
Bookmarks