So I see it was announced by Apple.
Bottom line: We get multitasking and NO Flash.
http://ca.tech.yahoo.com/blogs/the_g...s/article/4447
Oh well, maybe next time...
Phil.
Printable View
So I see it was announced by Apple.
Bottom line: We get multitasking and NO Flash.
http://ca.tech.yahoo.com/blogs/the_g...s/article/4447
Oh well, maybe next time...
Phil.
Yeah, Flash would only mean problems. Good move.
Flash wouldnt be a smart move for apple because then lots of people would play lots of online games and buy alot less games off the store - it would hurt apple and not help them
Damn it! I want flash to play farmville!
they'd still get the sales of 'non-game' apps and music etc...Quote:
Originally Posted by BentoSan
make no mistake, apple saying flash is too buggy to use is an excuse for the real reason: the ipad designed by them to consume media, media, they want you to pay for.
having flash on the ipad would mean
1) people could watch/listen to streaming movies and music without going through the "approved" methods.
2) people could bypass the crazy developer rules set in place by apple (that includes a binding agreement not to talk about the rules) and make their own apps out of flash.
#1 - The first rule of Fight Club is, you do not talk about Fight Club.Quote:
Originally Posted by charo
#2 - The second rule of Fight Club is, you DO NOT talk about Fight Club.
lol! I'm all for flash. I don't know why people are against it. I have never had problems running it on mac or win os. Why would it be different on ipads/iPhones/iPods?
I really don't need flash, if apple wants to use html5 so be it. I hate running flash on my Mac cuz it a CPU whore. Just my 2 pesos
I find it is a RAM whore, but on the CPU it is not that bad.Quote:
Originally Posted by JesC
Phil.