other than being the dead thread resurrector...I wanted to chime in on this too
Like I've said before, Im still getting used to the transition from vinyl to digital decks. Im slowly starting to realize...and enjoy the CONTROL I have.
So that being said...some of my best sets have been improvised completely freestyle. Most of my planned recorded mixes have a good overall "journey" feel to them but there has been some VERY dry, monotonous boring parts that also give it a very mechanical feel (sort of....one track to the next vibe). This may be because consciously, I am VERY aware it is being recorded and how shitty it will sound when and if I screw up.....but that is an other topic.
Maybe this was because of my lack of drive, technical talent, focus or patience back in the vinyl days but Im LOVING what I can now do with much more ease and precision now.
For example the simplicity, versatility and tremendous usefulness of the loop function for plain mixing purposes. Like MAKING a mix work when the math doesn’t work (i.e. using loops to prolong a mixin or mixout part until you TELL it you WANT the groove to DROP....I LOVE that shit, FUCK YEA!!! :D )
So anyway in that respect tell me planning isnt an attractive option (maybe memory is considered "planning" too)
Im actually working on a mix right now that I most definitely "planned"...I mean like the way JeSc said (detailed notes and all). For recorded mixes that you are using as a promo tool or what not I think should be planned. Tell me you dont think the big name DJs all just throw a couple completely freestyle sets together and just burn, duplicate and release them on the major record labels? Hell I think even Sasha & Digweed "planned" many of their most renowned mix CDs...that shit is like FLUID.
Final verdict for me...planning for promo or sort of "official" mixes is totally cool and live mixes should consist of a little of both...reading the crowd...and always rocking the fucking house.