Printable View
Guys,
With the recent release of Traktor Pro 3... we want to hear some feedback.
For myself, have not yet hooked everything up to the mixer, but have had a bit of a play around and have remapped my X1's to incorporate the new channel fx and reverse/flux features.
Can't wait to have a decent 4 hour jam to make sure all runs smoothly!
I am so underwhelmed by it I can’t begin to say...
Traktor is all I ever used and it's really sad that this is such a disappointing release. I have a feeling that NI had a lot riding on Stems and the Kontrol S8/D2. It seems like that was the last really substantial update from NI and unfortunately since it didn't pan out they probably had to go back to the drawing board.
This is a really confusing release. On one hand I can see their desire to release this update as Traktor Pro 3 rather than Traktor 2.12.0. The Traktor community was growing impatient with the lack of updates, especially when competition like Pioneer/rekordbox seemed to be putting out update after update.
However if this indeed isn't the real next version of Traktor (I believe this was mentioned in a recent interview) than I don't see why they couldn't have just released this as Traktor 2.12, and waited to showoff the real Traktor Pro 3 when that's ready.
They had the release of the new S2 and S4 so it's not like they only had a software update to announce. This update really feels like a re-skin, which doesn't really justify a new version number.
The only thing that I can say that seems like a really welcomed update is the new Elastique 3 time stretching algorithm. And I can't believe they released this as "Traktor Pro 3" without doing anything to the library/browser system. This is by far the most dated part of Traktor compared to the competition and it's the thing that every single DJ uses.
I would have been totally fine with them announcing the new hardware, a re skinned Traktor and leaving it at that.
I personally thought that unlocking DVS to work with anything was pretty huge, but hey ho.
(I haven't upgraded as yet, but I probably will)
It doesn't seem to work with every soundcard out there, as I've said in another thread. VCI-400's output levels seem to be too low. I'd guess there are more problems with other cards, but it's the only non NI one I've tried.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stazbumpa
Does the VCI400 have phono inputs?Quote:
Originally Posted by Archies'bald
I think so, I can connect two turntables to the mixer and play records through them. From memory I can't remeber whether they're line or phono though.Quote:
Originally Posted by Karlos Santos
Just checked - copied and pasted from Serato website.
The Vestax VCI-400 has a familiar layout to the popular VCI-380 but with the addition of 2 more channels for 4-deck mixing and dedicated FX controls. The VCI-400 has 2 switchable line/phono inputs, 2 MIC inputs, balanced outputs as well as control for looping, track browsing/loading, triggering samples and platters with adjustable tension
4 deck control
Dedicated FX controls
2 phono/line inputs
Just to add, I've installed the latest firmware also.
I see a level pot next to the inputs of the VCI. Maybe it should be turned up?
Is there a software riaa in traktor so one can use a soundcard with no phono preamps for the dvs?
I've turned the pot all the way up to 11. Maybe I'm missing something else.Quote:
Originally Posted by electroshock
This is probably true. A bit sad really because it was brave of NI to go down this route, and it was a good idea with a lot of potential. But since they never got a critical mass of tunes being released in Stem format...it was never going to take off. Always gutted when a company tries something different and gets hammered for it.Quote:
Originally Posted by rdej47
That's fair. And probably correct.Quote:
Originally Posted by sebrattansen
That being said, there are reasons.
First, the vast majority of gigging DJs don't actually do anything all that special or weird compared to the last 40 years of DJing. At least in my local scene, it seems like the most popular weird thing is video. And the way the local guys do it, it's just a video output that the club handles and different files that take longer to load. A few go more in-depth than that but pretty much accomplish the same thing with a little more control (e.g., AVB's setup from a few years ago involving fader start and SMTPE tracks). And if you're playing like that, it's a lot easier to show up with a USB key or at most a laptop and a USB or LAN cable.
When you're actually playing multiple times per week, load-in and load-out consume a lot of your time. And if you're not playing all night, you're moving all that stuff around in the booth with a lot of pressure to not screw anything up. It's solvable, and a lot of people do it. But, it's a largely unnecessary PITA.
Second, the vast majority of gigging DJs who do truly weird things (think Hawtin, Dubfire, PVD, etc.) are cobbling together setups that are significantly more customized than just Traktor (and they often use Traktor anyway; they just use other things that are better at those "other" features). Plus, Serato has had the same capabilities that Stem, Remix, and Sample decks add for years via Ableton Live integration. And Traktor still can't match it.
I'm convinced that sponsorships are the only reason the likes of Hawtin and Dubfire aren't using Serato/Live. It's just easier to set up and more reliable. If I were trying to do a decks + Push + synths thing today, that's the way I'd do it. If for some reason I wanted to use Maschine instead of Push, I'd still run it as a plugin in Live. It's just a simpler and more powerful setup.
In addition to that, Stems are one of those things that "everybody" thinks they want. But, they actually don't. A lot of care goes into making a track. And while there is something magical about a true live performance, the level of control just isn't there for working with stems the way NI envisioned. There are huge compromises both in technical terms and in performance terms. They're not good at anything but live mashups.
And trying to do live mashups doesn't quite work right like that. It can work great, but it's always a little sloppy compared to doing it in the studio ahead of time, and it still doesn't have that "live magic" that a band or true live performance has. It's really no better than finding a'capellas and instrumentals and doing the kinds of things DJs have been doing since the '70s.
So, they're pretty much down to a different control surface that works basically the same way but looks somewhat but not completely different. Personally, I think the D2 and S8 were the best things NI has released in years. But, I'm in the minority. I finally bought my D2s (the last two my GC ever got) right before they were discontinued. Having used every major way of DJing, it's my favorite. And, I almost feel abandoned. There's going to be a limit to how long they work...at some point, my computer is going to need an upgrade that precludes their use.
NI, specifically, has burned me like that a couple times in the past...when I needed to upgrade something (usually a computer dying and needing a new one that wouldn't run old software anymore). Other companies have too; it's just a part of working with modern technology. But, it still kinda sucks. And it makes people weary to try something new that comes with that many additional headaches.
So, you're in a situation where either you pretty much DJ traditionally and Rekordbox gives you the easiest time of setup and tear-down or you want to do a bunch of live stuff and a customized setup gives you a lot more for the effort. And, with rekordbox, you're not so tied to the hardware. One of their controllers at home and export your library to USB keys (or bring the laptop and plugin via LAN) is at least as cost effective as a Traktor setup....but you pretty much don't need an equipment rider or any odd requests...which is a huge bonus when you're getting your foot in the door at local venues.
That's why those things failed.
If NI really wants to push "the future of DJing" to anyone who isn't exclusively playing in their bedroom (or a headliner that can get whatever crazy rider they want), the way forward is a standalone all-in-one S8 or standalone D2s that are simpler to setup and require, at most, power and audio connections (with both S/PDIF and Analog outputs to make setup & tear-down easier/quicker). But, that's still going to be a much tougher sale than "every club has this setup, and here's a cost-effective version that you can use at home, and you can effectively bring everything you really need to the club in your pants pockets".
I admire what they're trying to do. But it just doesn't work out for that many people.
I can’t believe I’m saying this, here, but after reading up a bit on VDJ’s Library & Smart List implementation, I’m seriously considering giving it a try.
Seriously... Hawtin and Dubfire don't get sponsorship. Anymore than they did for using the 92. They might get shit for free, but they don't get paid. They use Traktor because it's the best for their workflow, and they're happy with it. They'd move in a heartbeat if they needed to. They're also involved in developing a lot of the products they use, via feedback and possibly a little bit of sideline consultancy.Quote:
Originally Posted by mostapha
There are many people that don't like Serato. Myself included. Mainly because it's so fucking rigid, you can't customise anything. Don't like that layout? Tough shit. Want to use that controller? Tough shit.
Honestly, they're already using Live. They have the extra channels on their audio interface and mixer. Hawtin doesn't even use sync between Traktor and Live.
I've been telling people this for years but many just don't believe it.Quote:
Originally Posted by astromech
I've no idea what deals Serato or Ableton have with artists but NI don't sponsor anyone.
Ok, but the rest of his post is SPOT ON.
My god, seen it a number of times, DJ's using remix/stem decks occassionally and then just making a studio edit of a thing they did live just because it sounds better/is easier. Remember the flood of used F1 controllers on forums after they released the remix decks?
I will still continue using Traktor. I don't need better Traktor library management, that would just make me lazier lol. As astromech said, I hate rigidity of Serato. And those parallel waveforms (probably PTSD from all the years watching SSL boys rant about sync one moment and then doing the Serato face when riding waveforms).
Using RekordboxDJ would only bring me more problems later when Pioneer closes their software to all 3rd party devices.
So bypass of internal mixer in external mode and better keylock are good enough reasons for me to upgrade. But yeah, minor upgrades that won't be worth it for a majority of users.
So boys, I am going back to Traktor. Now I just need to find an easy way to sync my Engine Prime and Traktor libraries. :-p
VDJ has been downlow blowing the competition out of the water for years...Quote:
Originally Posted by Patch
I know - it’s just so fucking ugly! :lol:
If anyone knows of any good looking VDJ skins I’d love to see ‘em... (No H/W emulation skins).
Traktor skin? :))))Quote:
Originally Posted by Patch
I've used VDJ7 and 8 quite a lot. The browser features are light years ahead of Traktor and the features are super useful.
But... midi implementation, coming from a Traktor background is frustrating at best and wall-punchingly annoying.
I could make VDJ7 crash with the most simple of scripts that a simple macro in Traktor would have just worked.
VDJ8 has been very, very stable but the factory mappings for NI controllers are dreadful. How anyone can do any kind of performance DJing on it is beyond me. It seems to do anything and everything really well apart from playing music.
The waveforms are pointless skid-marks.
Leopard skin :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally Posted by Patch
Traktor's mapping is insanely powerful. If I could somehow breed Traktor's and Live's mapping abilities (live mostly for the speed of simple things) and apply it to every piece of software I use, I'd be in heaven.
There are things Traktor's mapping can do that you don't seem to be able to do in anything else without a microcontroller in the way.
I own a full Virtual DJ license, & every now & then I re-visit it & consider using it.
I just can't get past that GUI though. Whatever skin you put on it, it still looks like a toy. I know it's irrational, & I should base any decisions on what the software actually does. .....but come on, at least make it look pretty!
It does look like a toy.
Makes 100% sense.Quote:
Originally Posted by thisisian
Humans with relatively normal vision and hearing prioritize visual information drastically. If a piece of software or a plugin or a processor or a mixer or whatever doesn't look right to create the mojo you want, you'll at least think it sounds wrong too. At the very least, it won't be inspiring.
It's kinda dumb. There's no technical reason why it should be that way. But, it is.
And as an artist, all that stuff matters.
Traktor Pro 3 seems to be very easy to use, I haven't upgraded yet, still learning Traktor 2.
VDJ's general branding is horrific, really.Quote:
Originally Posted by thisisian
YesQuote:
Originally Posted by A$H
Everything said here is exactly what the core base of Traktor is feeling, a general disappointment in the company.
I gotta say, since starting 7 years ago I have been all for Traktor. I stood by my guns when people talked down on it. But now, its hard to even disagree with what other DJs say. I have played on every software and when I come back to Traktor, while familiar is left with "why don't we have that" feelings.
I even upgraded to Traktor 3 just to see if I could consider sticking to it but its not a viable option in my market. I have everything mapped to the gills and still feel like the software should be better. Especially the library management portions, I hate to gripe but is it too hard to listen to what the core consumers have been saying?
/rant
Hard moments for Traktor and djing itself.
Someone could envision future? 3 years? 5? 10?
Damn was hoping this would of been a great update....but doesn't look good from what ppl are saying. I'll still probably update but not right away.
Fixed that for you. With Traktor you always had to explain to a lot of DJs that "Traktor certified" is only important if you use DVS.Quote:
Originally Posted by A$H
Everything I want it to be, and a little more. Recently 'downgraded' to an S2 from an S4 and it has really brought the S2 'alive'. Previous mixes often sounded 'harsh' on the lower end sound systems and I'm finding the sound 'smoother'. Did a 3 hour gig recently and found it less taxing on the eyes and ears.
unusable for the moment with the keylock-sync bug.
Hoping that the complete new rewritten code will support future updates faster then they did in the past, bummed they dropped the d2's but glad they are still working. The master fx bring nothing for me, pioneer wannabe.
In fact i don't use a lot traktors fx because of the mixer i use ...
They haven't dropped support for the D2s. They've discontinued production and sales.Quote:
Originally Posted by ragverp
Found a bug today that will make me drop that update. If you set your loop recorder source to cue (doesn't happen when it's set to main), the output volume of the sample recorded is way lower than the original source.
It's a major bummer for me as the loop recorder, and by extension remix decks, are part of my workflow.