I'm sort of in the market for a 4+ channel mixer and do people feel that the Ecler Nuo-4 is better than a Xone 42 or 62?
Just wondering since all 3 of those mixers are about the same price. (Actually the 62s are the least expensive atm)
Printable View
I'm sort of in the market for a 4+ channel mixer and do people feel that the Ecler Nuo-4 is better than a Xone 42 or 62?
Just wondering since all 3 of those mixers are about the same price. (Actually the 62s are the least expensive atm)
my current 4 channel favourite is the Denon DN-X1600.
the recent (read chinese) Xones appear to be not as durable as the old ones, so probably the Ecler would be the better choice if you're buying a new mixer.
is there any specific reason why you would want a pure analogue mixer?
Never tried any of these mixers, but I did worked on xone 42 and 62, thats why (whell, untill past few posts) I would allways go fo xone 22.
It has a built in filter, and I personally like it more that headphones controls are on top. And I just love the xone EQ.
@Loop: Reason for a pure analogue mixer is price...I really love denon mixers, any of them, but even x600 is a lot more expencive than xone 22 and nuo 2.0. Again, xone 42 is much cheaper than x1600, and so on...
pure analog does not mean that there is an interface in them, it means that the circuts and stuff like that is analog. the source of the sound might be digital, that is another storry. :)
but i dig the ecler love, i adore the eq's.
I just got home from picking it up :D
its in pretty good condition, some minor scuffs and scratches but everything else is good.
d2??? Please some nice video, not any good ones on youtube!!!!!!!!!
lol not the d2, the NUO-4!
this is MY thread, remember?! :P
I want to know what you thinks!
Be sure to hurry back and let us know with an extremely detailed review!
...hehehe ;)