soundcloud.com/hpntk / soundcloud.com/freakstep
freakstep.com / thefreakbeat.com
me on beatport / me on djtunes
Originally Posted by JesterNZDJ
MacBook Pro (2.66 i7| 8GB RAM| 500 GB 7200 RPM) | Ableton 8 Suite | Logic Pro 9 | Kontrol S4 | AIAIAI TMA-1 | Akai MPK 25 | Apogee Duet 2 | KRK RP5s
just read this, kind of scary how courts work over there. good ol' globalization ("European Arrest Warrant"?? wtf)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11937110Gerard Batten, a UKIP MEP, said the Assange case highlighted the dangers of the European arrest warrant, because the judge has no power to listen to the evidence to judge if there is a prime facie case.
He said: "I don't know of the quality of the evidence in Mr Assange's case but it does seem that he is involved in political turmoil and intrigue and there are a lot of people keen to shut him up and there is nothing a court in the UK can do to look at the evidence before they extradite him."
soundcloud.com/hpntk / soundcloud.com/freakstep
freakstep.com / thefreakbeat.com
me on beatport / me on djtunes
Originally Posted by JesterNZDJ
Wikileaks has brought to the public information ranging from specific incidents of civilian casualties in Iraq, to the politics around why Boeing lost a Belgian contract for fighter jets. Their releases have been wide ranging, and provide a public service no other entity is able or willing to provide. Traditionally, this has been the role of news organizations, but there really is no such thing anymore since the idea (mandate) of news as a public service is no longer relevant. News is now a for profit source of entertainment - especially in the US - and it's no longer possible for modern news organizations to act in this role. What's more, Wikileaks has cooperated with major news organizations all over the world BEFORE releasing information, so to imply that they're just releasing information without considering it's impact is ignoring the facts. Assange could have been MORE salacious and controversial and generated a LOT more publicity if he had released ALL of the information available to him with no redaction, edits, or omissions (such as specific names). But we know for a fact that these kinds of considerations had been made in the past.
|
|
Bookmarks