Controller Hack: NanoPad, LPD8 or Ipad ? - Page 2
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16
  1. #11
    Tech Mentor etch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    London
    Posts
    101

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MrPopinjay View Post
    Hey- that's not a bad idea. Finally a use for the korg nanokey?
    exactly! although the nano series is quite micro internally interms of space to solder to

    Quote Originally Posted by wateredge View Post
    can I split it up?
    beacuse I want the keys in a unique row
    yes ofcourse in theory, get rid of the plastic keys from the nanokey, choose some new buttons, and then resolder them to the contacts for the original keys, no need to split the circuit board up!

    although especially with something so neatly designed, [im currently attempting a nanokontrol rearrange, its not proving easy] theres only micro surfaces to solder to - not something to attempt if youve never soldered!

    so a slightly larger / cheaper controller may actually be better just because it will have larger contacts internally if youve never soldered, thats where something like the UMC-32 holds its own, you basically wouldnt need to solder!

    USB game controllers are quite good, (really cheap off ebay)

    or if your happy to learn some code something like the Arduino (and you could then have veolicty sensitive pads again)

    hope some of this is useful
    woof

  2. #12
    Tech Convert
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by etch View Post
    hope some of this is useful
    very useful, thanks ;-)

    the UMC-32 seems to be the best choice.
    What if I use pressure sensors instead of buttons/pads ?
    http://www.sparkfun.com/products/9375

  3. #13
    Tech Guru Str8upDrew's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    1,158

    Default

    Unfortunately UMC-32 doesn't support any pressure sensitive controls.

  4. #14
    Tech Mentor etch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    London
    Posts
    101

    Default

    and heres another option to the UMC-32,

    http://www.leobodnar.com/products/BU0836/

    much cheaper! but again with less flexibility in the long run, but will do what you want easily, but again as far as i can see will not support velocity sensitive pads,,
    woof

  5. #15
    Tech Convert
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    7

    Default

    it seems much easier to use than the UMC-32
    and it's cheaper ;-)
    Thanks

  6. #16
    Tech Mentor etch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    London
    Posts
    101

    Default

    no problem

    and good luck! let us know how it all goes
    woof

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •