i am not talking about turntablists, i am talking about DJ's. I am also not talking about what is valued more, i am talking about the fact that beatmixing is often made out to be some kind of higher artform that only a few can achieve and master, while i think it is not. I see that some people are trying to create some magical aura around DJ'ing to make it special what they're doing, and it bothers me. Beatmixing is just one technique you *can* use to be a good DJ, but you don't have to use it. I know a very good DJ that cannot beatmix for the hell of it, or maybe he can but he doesn't bother, and still he can rock a dancefloor with the most amazing musical selection, while another super-technical DJ can clear a dancefloor in a few minutes using all technologies available but playing the wrong records.
So, to come back to the OP and the topic-subject (beatmatching, a lost art?) my answer is: no, because it's not an art, it's simply a technique you can learn, a tool in your DJ toolbox you *can* use, but don't have to. Maybe sometimes a DJ can create art, when all the aspects of DJing come together and something greater than the sum is created. But that's something else. Comparing beatmatching to an art is like comparing sawing or mowing to an art. You can use a saw to create art with, but the saw and the sawing in itself are not an art, and if an electrical saw comes along instead of an handsaw, it doesn't make a difference for the artfullness of the end-product that is created imho.
Again, this is simply my opinion, people don't have to agree.![]()
Bookmarks