Sub-bass effects? - Page 2
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 22
  1. #11

    Default

    Thanks for the explanation, Bento. I think I'll just abandon this idea for the time being...maybe once I'm opening for Crookers I'll look back into it :P.
    Balls of Steel
    DJ/Producer
    SoundCloud | Twitter | Website

  2. #12
    Tech Guru
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    2,597

    Default

    hmm interesting... but is it really necessary I wonder.. all songs are mixed/engineered so that everything is level. if you added more bass than you'd be fucking up how the rest of the levels sound in the track, which would create an imbalance and possibly distortion when you try to compensate by boosting the mid and hi eqs....

    i'm not really sure I believe theres any credibility to this claim. but prove me wrong, i'd like to see if there's any truth to this story!

  3. #13

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by duerr View Post
    hmm interesting... but is it really necessary I wonder.. all songs are mixed/engineered so that everything is level. if you added more bass than you'd be fucking up how the rest of the levels sound in the track, which would create an imbalance and possibly distortion when you try to compensate by boosting the mid and hi eqs....

    i'm not really sure I believe theres any credibility to this claim. but prove me wrong, i'd like to see if there's any truth to this story!
    I'm not talking about just boosting the bass; yeah, that would mess everything up. I'm talking about adding sub-bass. Like another level of bass an octave below the other bass. Just an idea.
    Balls of Steel
    DJ/Producer
    SoundCloud | Twitter | Website

  4. #14
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Milwaukee, WI
    Posts
    1,794

    Default

    Take the original track, add a filter so all you have is the low end, and transpose it down an octave. Add a compressor and side chain a kick so it doesn't distort on the normal kick.

    First thing that came to mind as far as how to do it.

  5. #15
    Tech Mentor
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    120

    Default

    just to quote an old epic Beasty Boys track: remember - don't do it at home with your dad`s stereo... -

    If you`re talking about transposing about an octave down from the lowest bass on the track you`de have to divide the frequency by two ie: normally a typical techno track has its bass somewhere around 40 hz, now what you`re talking about is cranking up the 20 hz frequency which is WAY beyond what most portable PA speakers will reproduce loud enought to give a faintly audible impression. Actually its quite close to the lowest frequency most ears will notice, hence beyond the range that most cheaper hifi or Pa drivers are constructed for. Typically you`de expect the minus 6 db point of an average PA subwoofer with a 15" driver to be between 35 and 40 hz with a sharp decline thereafter. THX subwoofers for movie reproduction go down much deeper but usually sound kinda crappy for music.

    Anyway just generate a 20hz sine wave, crank up the volume, whatch the membrane move and think about doing that at an audible level in a cheapo venue and you'll see (not hear) what I´m trying to get across.
    Last edited by derjay; 05-19-2009 at 11:09 AM.

  6. #16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nephew View Post
    Take the original track, add a filter so all you have is the low end, and transpose it down an octave. Add a compressor and side chain a kick so it doesn't distort on the normal kick.

    First thing that came to mind as far as how to do it.
    this is exactly right. First thing that popped up in my head, too. Easiest way for sure.

    Good thinking Nephew

  7. #17
    Tech Wizard Lucid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by derjay View Post
    just to quote an old epic Beasty Boys track: remember - don't do it at home with your dad`s stereo... -
    ...only under hip hop supervision.
    www.TheLucidLounge.com
    TSP 1.1.2 || Tech 1200's || Ecler Nou4 || Ableton Live 7

  8. #18
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Milwaukee, WI
    Posts
    1,794

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rumblejazz View Post
    this is exactly right. First thing that popped up in my head, too. Easiest way for sure.

    Good thinking Nephew

    Just trying to think how to automate the process now so it can be done live

  9. #19

    Default

    in ableton you could route the main output into a new audio channel. Set up the filter, then have that going into the a octave shift ( down an octave -or two? - obviously) then add that back to the main mix.

    I think you would have to be very careful with this, could end sounding very muddy. and the filter might have to be adjusted for each song.

  10. #20
    Tech Guru lethal_pizzle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Maida Vegas, London
    Posts
    2,815

    Default

    Interesting. I've heard a lot of people say that when playing 320k MP3s, the compression takes away the frequencies that you can hear, but not what you can feel.

    For example, playing a WAV of a dubstep tune in a club is going to rattle your insides, but an MP3 won't. If there was some way of adding extra sub-frequencies from the intact higher frequencies in MP3's, that could be quite interesting.
    DJTT Nu Disco Mix Train Vol 1
    beats and balearic bobs in north-west london
    iTunes podcast
    soundcloud

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •