Agreed. That mentality is bullshit
Agreed. That mentality is bullshit
http://www.mixcloud.com/Olsgaard/
House/Techno Dj from Denmark
I'm confused are you agreeing that someone should play a rip cus it's better that it's played and heard (which is what I believe) or are you agreeing that if the artist made it 'vinyl only' then it should stay that way ?
btw - Joy Orbison and Boddika are excellent examples to use.
I'm agreeing that If I pay the money to buy a rare vinyl and I want to play it out then I should be allowed to rip it to WAV because of the practicality of it, who wants to lug vinyl round these days too? and the artist is losing out on anything if you rip it unless you share it to the world, but why would you share such an exclusivity?
I should have quoted the person I was referring too ha sorry
http://www.mixcloud.com/Olsgaard/
House/Techno Dj from Denmark
There's a distinction between ripping your back catalogue of vinyl and ripping old gems you find (which is fine) and ripping new tunes that the artist and label don't want played digitally. There are vinyl only labels for a reason. Ripping their tunes is disrespectful.
DJM800 | 2xCDJ2000 | RMX1000 | Adidas HD25's
2011 MBP | Traktor 2.6 | Kontrol S4 | Scratch Live | SL2
Mac Pro | Ableton | Access Virus C | Maschine
Facebook || Soundcloud || Twitter
Don't see why people care so much about what the artist thinks? You've just spent a lot of money on a vinyl that you can only play out A) the club has turntables and B) if you can be arsed taking it all. I'm sure you want to make life easier for yourself and rip it. Plus the label wont find out unless your in the big leagues... Im which case you'll be able to get your vinyl there no problem because your on mega bucks!
All I wanted to know was it worth it with sound quality etc?
|
Bookmarks