History is full of "starving, misunderstood artists" and "corporate sellouts" and tons of people who are in between. Nonetheless, the OP is still a step or two away from being the DJ equivalent of a franchise fast food joint.
DJs can be artists. DJs can provide a service. Both are viable routes to follow. Most people are somewhere between the extremes (except when posting on chat boards, of course). Successful DJs take the route of "running a small business" regardless of the content they choose to provide.
I refuse to play all sorts of music because I find it offensive or objectionable. There is another huge pile of songs that are on "Do Not Play" lists because of the context of the venue and the event (e.g. gangsta rap at a wedding reception rarely fits the vibe).
Thinking of "commercial pop remixes" as "overplayed" is one thing. Thinking of that music as "lose your integrity and your soul" is a bit over the top. Insulting the taste of your audience is rarely a successful business model.
Which is why I said this too:
"...There is nothing wrong with creating a fun atmosphere, or with playing music that speaks to you. In two hours, you have time for 40-ish tracks....more if you mix a lot, less if you let songs play out. In either case, this event is not about 10 songs and it's not about 100 songs.
If you are unable to find 40 songs that fit your style AND are well known enough to be recognized and liked by the audience, then your "artistic integrity" is far too narrowly focused..."
How far into your underground sub-sub-sub-genre do you have to get before you can not find 40-ish songs that you like AND are relatable for a "general" audience....???
Bookmarks