Vestax Vci 300 Vs Hercules RMX Vs Torq Xponent - Page 2
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12
  1. #11
    DJTT Dominator JesC's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    127.0.0.1
    Posts
    5,611

    Default

    I am a owner of the following controllers. VCI-100 SE, M-Audio X-Session, Hercules DJ MK1, and also had a VCI-100 that I upgraded to V1.3 w/overlay.

    I have used a ton of controllers, RMX, X-Ponent, CUE, VCM/VCI-300, Serato and the list goes. I dont mean to be a fanboy toward the 100 or 300. Its just that Vestax puts out quality, but you always get for what you pay for.

    The main reason that I dislike the X-Ponent is the location of Jog wheels, they dont feel natural, the pitch fader feel weird and very lose, and yes is have a million buttons, but no real though was put in of the location of them. I was messing around with photoshop and this is what my xponent would look like if I worked for M-Audio. Guys I took like 10 mins on this so dont clown, being that it looks very ghetto. This looks alot like a hybrid of a VCI-100 & 300 plus a XSession.

    Last edited by JesC; 12-29-2008 at 07:16 AM. Reason: opps!
    Controllerist: Think different | SoundCloud | MixCloud | Twitter |

  2. #12
    Tech Mentor
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Bay Area, CA.
    Posts
    179

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JesC View Post
    I have used a ton of controllers, RMX, X-Ponent, CUE, VCM/VCI-300, Serato and the list goes. I dont mean to be a fanboy toward the 100 or 300. Its just that Vestax puts out quality, but you always get for what you pay for.
    Agreed. That was actually sort of what I was trying to get at - it depends on what you intended to 'do' with your kit. No need to spend nearly $1000 if all you want to do is mess around here and there. On the other hand, if this is going to be your bread-n-butter, I'd imagine that even the 300 wouldn't be looked at - now you're entering the world of Xone or similar.

    That said, I own a RMX and there are things about it I definitely can't stand like the lack of VU meters and the ever-annoying lack of LEDS underneath *all* of the buttons. (thank the good people over at NI for putting a on/off LED next to the EQ pots on Traktor Pro). As my skills build up, I'll be eyeing the Otus next. But for now, the RMX serves my needs - my solution was to junk the BS 'evaluation-level' software that tends to ship with most controllers and invest some bux in the full version of Traktor. So for me, the RMX, a Korg nanoKontrol (for offloading my FX and loop controls from the RMX) and Traktor Pro work great *and* keep my costs in control.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •