Harmonic Mixing – Am I missing something? - Page 2
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 32
  1. #11
    Tech Mentor
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Tempe
    Posts
    183

    Default

    well technically you should mix in key to have your mixes sounds good together. Mixed in Key is just a software to analyze your songs key. Still you shouldn't limit yourself with the keys all over.

  2. #12
    Moderator keithace's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    5,270

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DJMM View Post
    Still you shouldn't limit yourself with the keys all over.

    whaaa?
    Weapons, not food, not homes, not shoes
    Not need, just feed the war cannibal animal

  3. #13
    Tech Mentor
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Tempe
    Posts
    183

    Default

    yeah bad sentence, I mean you shouldn't worry if the next song is 5A on camelot wheel and the playing song is 4A.

    If it sounds good from 2A to 6A, just mix it.

  4. #14
    Tech Mentor
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Chester, UK
    Posts
    146

    Default

    Great, thanks for the feedback on this. I was just thinking i was missing something but surely, if it sounds good to the ear then it probably is (unless stone deaf!)

    Going back to enjoying the tunes and forgeting the silly little numbered alphabet

  5. #15
    Tech Guru Alex Wild's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    564

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mrpopinjay View Post
    here's my system. Pick a track that might work, listen in the headphones? Does it work? No? Pick another. Yes? Mixing time. :d
    this
    Mixes: www.mixcloud.com/djalexwild/
    Production: www.soundcloud.com/alexwild
    DJM500 : X1 : MBP 15" 2.53 GHz 4 GB RAM : HD25SP : MASCHINE

  6. #16
    DJTT Infectious Moderator photojojo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Sherman, TX
    Posts
    13,925

    Default

    This all boils down to a sign of the times. When it was records we would write keys on them so harmonic mixing definitely isn't new. Back then though we only had 100 records to go through at a gig because we did the prep work before hand. Now that we can have 1000's of tracks at our disposal it's much harder to pick a track, especially if you don't really know your music which is a nasty result of having 1000's of tracks. So software like MIK has come about that culls the songs down for you so you're only picking from 200 tracks to play next instead of blankly staring at your track collection.

    Some people don't realize the amount of behind the scenes work that goes into just playing music. They want software to do all of that work for them and it just doesn't work like that, or at least it doesn't work well imo. All that said I use MIK to tag all of my tracks, but it just serves as a guide.
    Chris Jennings FHP

    Podcast - Soundcloud - Mixcloud - Beatport Charts - x

  7. #17
    Tech Guru sarasin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Cape Town
    Posts
    5,079

    Default

    Well, I can honestly say that this has taken my mixing one step further down the quality line.

    I mean, due to knowing how to do it now manually (Used to catch it in the past purely by accident) and at will, you can hear when someone does not do it instantly.

    So I know that when I do use it and use it when its needed, my mix WILL sound damn good.

    It also allows you to get more creative.

    If you are jamming 2 tracks that fit harmonically, it allows you to mashup instantly and you can go to town.



    Its nice to use if you have not setup a playlist before hand.
    APC80:STR8-100's+Ortofon Concorde Scratch\Electro:ButterRugz:TSP2-NI Audio4DJ:Xone22+Innofader:MacBook Pro 15"
    www.soundcloud.com/djsarasin
    www.youtube.com/adriansarasin

  8. #18
    Tech Guru mostapha's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    4,748

    Default

    "Harmonic Mixing" isn't limiting. Only mixing by the circle of fifths is. And the people who tend to write about harmonic mixing using Camelot Notation don't know that there's any more to the story.

    Ditch camelot notation.
    Use real keys.
    And actually start learning about music theory.

    Also, I know it was probably a random example, but 2A to 6A would probably be safe-ish…it certainly isn't a sure thing…but it'd be more likely to work than some other random choices, depending on what chords and scales were used in both songs. Then again, that's true for 1A to 2A as well.

    Basically, MiK's marketing is made to sell overpriced software, not teach you how to mix harmonically. And everyone listens to their advice as though it's gospel. Which is bullshit.

  9. #19
    Tech Guru MrPopinjay's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    3,747

    Default

    Ok, probably should have said "Mixed in key and the wheelyjig is limiting" :P
    The xwax Thread! - The minimal open source DVS for Linux!
    Reddit's /r/DJs! - Another great DJ community!

  10. #20
    Tech Wizard
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    19

    Default Camelot Notation

    Quote Originally Posted by mostapha View Post
    "Harmonic Mixing" isn't limiting. Only mixing by the circle of fifths is. And the people who tend to write about harmonic mixing using Camelot Notation don't know that there's any more to the story.

    Ditch camelot notation.
    Use real keys.
    And actually start learning about music theory.

    Also, I know it was probably a random example, but 2A to 6A would probably be safe-ish…it certainly isn't a sure thing…but it'd be more likely to work than some other random choices, depending on what chords and scales were used in both songs. Then again, that's true for 1A to 2A as well.

    Basically, MiK's marketing is made to sell overpriced software, not teach you how to mix harmonically. And everyone listens to their advice as though it's gospel. Which is bullshit.
    Virtually all modern music uses the diatonic scale (do-re-mi-fa-sol-la-ti-do), which is represented by the Circle of Fifths (see [ame="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circle_of_fifths"]Circle of fifths - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/ame] Also see [ame="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diatonic_scale"]Diatonic scale - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/ame]

    Using "real keys," rather than Camelot notation (based on the Circle of Fifths), is MUCH more difficult. Memorizing compatible keys based on diatonic key signature rather than keycodes GREATLY lengthens the learning curve.

    "Harmonic Keys," which introduced harmonic mixing to the DJ community in the 1980's, advocated memorization of an overlay chart to select compatible mixes. Camelot streamlined the process in 1991 with our Easymix System, which makes selecting compatible keys as easy as telling time.

    Learning music theory and keying your own music may be more effective, but may require THOUSANDS of hours to attain the skills necessary to key music with greater accuracy than key detection software like MixedInKey.

    Further, you can mix 2A to 6A or any other combination as long as you mix atonal segments. Whenever both track segments contain tonal music, however, any such mixes will be dissonant unless they are harmonically compatible.
    Last edited by Camelot; 11-26-2011 at 02:40 PM.

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •