Bitrates - Page 2
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16

Thread: Bitrates

  1. #11
    Tech Convert
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    16

    Default

    I can sometimes get away with 160 CBR in the club but I try not to dip below 192. Just depends on how well the track was mastered sometimes.
    Hp Laptop | VCI-100SE | M-Audio Conectiv

  2. #12
    Tech Convert
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Soup View Post
    I can sometimes get away with 160 CBR in the club but I try not to dip below 192. Just depends on how well the track was mastered sometimes.
    Plus how it was ripped to mp3. I've found some 160s and 192s that sound better than higher bitrate files; more clarity, headroom. I'm not sure how people are screwing up the encoding process that badly but it's common.

  3. #13
    Tech Wizard
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    germany,near münster
    Posts
    28

    Default

    yes there is an other encoder than lame, but itīs not free to use. itīs from the inventors of mp3 ,the Fraunhofer MPEG Layer-3 Audio Decoder

  4. #14
    Tech Mentor VoOFA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    dk
    Posts
    140

    Default

    [QUOTE=tekki;4547]Is there any other than LAME?

    Surely there's lots of other encoders than LAME, but every .mp3 sound geek on the internet seem to agree, that this is the leeding in size/quality!

    Personaly I clearly hear the depth different compared to eg. iTunes encoder, there's are really big difference!

    Also if your on a Mac, the iTunes-LAME application makes everything a lot easier if you still like to convert using iTunes. Simply insert your CD, select it in iTunes and the press go on iTunes-Lame (after you have chosen your quality setup ofcourse).

    Enjoy your new and better sounding mp3's!

  5. #15
    Mr. Golden EanGolden's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    970

    Default

    it seems that a good mp3 is often only as good as its encoder.

    a LAME encoded mp3 from a wav source is usually very good at 256 or above.

  6. #16
    DJTT Ninja Mod tekki's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Afterhour Ali's lap
    Posts
    11,357

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by VoOFA View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by tekki View Post
    Is there any other than LAME?
    Surely there's lots of other encoders than LAME, but every .mp3 sound geek on the internet seem to agree, that this is the leeding in size/quality!

    Personaly I clearly hear the depth different compared to eg. iTunes encoder, there's are really big difference!

    Also if your on a Mac, the iTunes-LAME application makes everything a lot easier if you still like to convert using iTunes. Simply insert your CD, select it in iTunes and the press go on iTunes-Lame (after you have chosen your quality setup ofcourse).

    Enjoy your new and better sounding mp3's!
    The question was retorical. In other my eyes LAME encoding is the best. It is supposed to be the "scene's best" too, while using it through Exact Audio Copy.
    RSTRCTD | twitter | facebook (RSTRCTD) facebook (LJ) | vimeo | pinterest | my studio | soundcloud (RSTRCTD)| soundcloud (LJ)
    -- CHECK our DEBUT (DEEP)HOUSE EP RELEASE ON BEATPORT "RSTRCTD - EXISTENCE" --

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •