Goodbye Traktor - Page 2
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 25

Thread: Goodbye Traktor

  1. #11

    Default

    I found the mapping were not what I wanted and spent hours tweaking it to my liking only to end up with it still lacking something.. I don't mind traktor with say my total control I just don't feel inclined to use it compared to my ns6 and sdj... Traktor I feel is missing too much of an authentic feel... I honestly felt traktor was making me a lazy Dj in a sense

  2. #12
    Tech Guru mostapha's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    4,748

    Default

    I don't blame you. It's nice hardware. I have the same problems with it that I do all of Pioneer's mixers (EQs and Filters are too ham-fisted), but that's really just a preference thing.

    It does what it needs to do very well.

  3. #13
    Tech Guru the_bastet's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    2,867

    Default

    Why do you find the EQs and Filters to be clumsy?
    - Equipment - 2X Technics 1200, 2X Audio Technica ATLP1240, 2X XDJ700, 2X XDJ1000 MK2, Denon DNX-1100, Mixars DUO, DJM750 MK2, NI Audio 10, NI Aduio 4, Serato SL3, 4X Shure M44-7, 2X Ortofon Pro S, 2X Numark Groove Tool, Maschine MK3, Samson Carbon 49, Roland SE-02, Novation Launchcontrol, TouchOSC, Nocation Peak, Arturia MiniBrute, Korg Volca Kick, MicroKorg (Classic), NI Komplete Audio 6

  4. #14
    Tech Guru mostapha's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    4,748

    Default

    They're too aggressive for me.

    I used to love full-kill EQs. At some point, I saw the light....so I never really want to turn them past about 10 o'clock, even on the non-iso ones (which the SX doesn't have). I also don't really like the crossover frequencies. As for the filters....they're just....wrong....too fast of a sweep and way too high resonance to use as anything but a cheap effect that I thought everybody got sick of in like 2005. I just don't get along with Pioneer mixers. They get old fast.

    It does feel weird to use the SX...I don't use the EQs or the Filters....I don't use the gains (because Traktor and SDJ both have auto-gain that works)...I don't use crossfaders...I leave the master out where I have it. So....it's a lot of controls to ignore.

    Whatever...I ordered my new mixer, so if I like it...the thing will probably get sold eventually. I just have to decide if I want to keep it around to keep the CDJ-like habit.

  5. #15
    Tech Mentor
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    369

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mostapha View Post
    It does feel weird to use the SX...I don't use the EQs or the Filters....I don't use the gains (because Traktor and SDJ both have auto-gain that works)...I don't use crossfaders...I leave the master out where I have it. So....it's a lot of controls to ignore.
    Why don't you use the EQ's? I can understand not using mids or highs but I don't understand not using the low freq eq.

  6. #16
    Tech Mentor blatterjr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Architect
    Posts
    149

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hellnegative View Post
    So after playing around on the DDJ-SX, I've finally decided to order a DDJ-SX2. I attempted to use both the Viper and Pioneer mapping for Traktor and just was not happy. Serato also has way faster load times when loading tracks which makes it more efficient for turntablist routines. It is a sad day after all the work I have put in to utilizing Traktor, but all the bells and whistles have just weighed down the software.
    I've been using Traktor as a turntablist for a couple years now and haven't had any issues.

    (Though it's very possible I just suck! )
    ---------------------------
    Greybeard Turntablist
    Z2 / 1200's / X1 MK2 / F1 / Maschine MK2

  7. #17
    Tech Mentor beisi's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    205

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hellnegative View Post
    I got the SX2 and thee DVS expansion. So far liking it way better than anything else Ive used.
    Quote Originally Posted by hellnegative View Post
    I got the SX2 and thee DVS expansion. So far liking it way better than anything else Ive used.
    Also just got the SX2 as well and am loving it (no DVS exp yet, but am looking forward to it). Always had both Traktor and Serato up until recently when I realized I hardly ever used Traktor any more. Right or wrong it always felt like having to do a lot of prep with Traktor (grids, controller mapping) where in SDJ I barely spent any time doing that sort of thing. Traktor is way more configurable no doubt.

    The S8 looks quite nice (the screens mainly) but no tempo faders = no go for me

    Just wish the sx2 controller would show which FX are selected (then I think it would be perfect), but can kinda get around it by mirroring SDJ window to an ipad using AirDisplay and DuplicateWindows. Just wish my ipad res was higher.

    Personal preference I know but I still keep coming back to these fav Serato features:
    - jog wheels you can scratch with (380/SX vs S2/S4)
    - parallel wave forms
    - ability to easily set/slip beat grids on the fly from the hardware
    - the way the pitch fader adjust is implemented (hold shift, change pitch range center point)
    - elastic beat grids

    Whilst a lot of things are more or less equal now, Traktor still has some big things over Serato:
    - far more functions possible to midi map, complex mappings with modifiers etc (have spent to much time mapping, am done with it)
    - smart sync with DVS (some scratch DJs djing without headphones use this right..?)
    - sending midi clock (if you can figure out a way to deal with the drift, or use a mac)
    - remix decks vs SP6 (you can't even capture a sample from deck without using the mouse in SDJ/sp6)
    - thru FX on non traktor audio inputs
    - it used to use far less memory than SDJ (might be comparable now after the SDJ large library fix... not sure)

  8. #18

    Default

    I don't use my cross faders and my up faders are off when I'm cueing a track once its cued I eq kill and bring it 3/4 way up run eq controls to 20-30% then start their way to 50% for high and mids then slam the low to 50% and upfader 7/8th the way up and drop the low on the out track to 25% and then mix and fade out

  9. #19
    Tech Guru the_bastet's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    2,867

    Default

    The filter is useful when mixing with vocal tracks. Turning it up about 1mm gives just enough of a high pass boost. I do see what you're saying about the EQ's. You have to be very careful with them as they dont have a direct curve.

    No crossfader. No scratching for you.
    - Equipment - 2X Technics 1200, 2X Audio Technica ATLP1240, 2X XDJ700, 2X XDJ1000 MK2, Denon DNX-1100, Mixars DUO, DJM750 MK2, NI Audio 10, NI Aduio 4, Serato SL3, 4X Shure M44-7, 2X Ortofon Pro S, 2X Numark Groove Tool, Maschine MK3, Samson Carbon 49, Roland SE-02, Novation Launchcontrol, TouchOSC, Nocation Peak, Arturia MiniBrute, Korg Volca Kick, MicroKorg (Classic), NI Komplete Audio 6

  10. #20

    Default

    Haha no not these days I don't scratch much anymore my collection has very little hip hop in it and it's mostly deep house nudisco prog house(not the new prog genre garbage) and trance and I've been mixing a lot of trance lately much as I did in early 2000s and there's no need for a cross fader for any of those genres just better rotary up faders and very precise eqs to really do it properly especially on the trance that's where you really gotta have your Eqing and levels on point... Talking 136-142 range trance

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •