Yeah, I'm on the fence right now with the new Torq 1.5 and Traktor 3.4. Gonna give a few weeks worth of serious play time and experimentation on the new Torq before I decide on which one to stick with.
So far, I haven't been disappointed with 1.5. Traktor 3.4 runs solid as hell for me too. It all comes down to which one is gonna allow me to be more creative with my sets. Torq is winning that battle right now.
Native Instruments Kontrol S4
Apple Macbook (OS/X 10.5)
Core 2 Duo 2.4GHz (3MB L2 cache)
2GB PC5300 DDR2-667
If you really need the whole Zplane thing you can run your tracks though Ableton before importing them into Traktor - That way you can do pitchchanges and stuff that wouldnt be possible otherwise.
I don't think you're understanding the difference between Traktor's beat-grid system and the actual implementation of Torq's Z-Plane based anchoring (AKA, Ableton Live time stretching).
These two are nothing alike in their actual function. Not trying to fuel an argument of one is better then the other here Bento (that should be clear with research). I just don't want people coming in here getting the wrong idea about Torq's new anchoring system. It is better then what Traktor currently has implemented. Surely you wouldn't argue that Traktor's beat-grid system is better then what Ableton Live (now Torq) has implemented.
Also, why would I want the trouble of warping every track I get in Ableton just to get it to flow properly in my DJ software? Torq now does this for me in one shot (setting up anchors). I can also run Torq via Re-Wire in Live now with accurate midi-syncing that dynamically changes in Ableton as I DJ in Torq.
You have a slew of things to consider with a comparable Traktor / Live setup (3rd party software).
Last edited by Travis; 12-31-2008 at 11:40 AM.
Native Instruments Kontrol S4
Apple Macbook (OS/X 10.5)
Core 2 Duo 2.4GHz (3MB L2 cache)
2GB PC5300 DDR2-667
I know the difference i use both Traktor and Ableton live at the same time, i was merely explaining that the explination that you gave were incorrect and it was indeed possible to do what you explained.
I have allways recommended people use Abletons warping method for complex pitch changes.
What isnt possible in traktor is to change the pitch after the track is synced and keylocked when achieving the desired result you were speaking of.
Last edited by BentoSan; 12-31-2008 at 11:43 AM.
What explanation was incorrect? I was putting out a testament to the new time-stretching system built into Torq. You tried equating Traktors beat-grid system to it, this was an injustice as thats like comparing apples and oranges.
Torq's new anchoring system is far superior. The creative possibilities are huge.
Native Instruments Kontrol S4
Apple Macbook (OS/X 10.5)
Core 2 Duo 2.4GHz (3MB L2 cache)
2GB PC5300 DDR2-667
|
|
Bookmarks