I love my RCF's and wouldn't put anyone off buying a pair.
Has no one mentioned FBT's? Great powered boxes imo.
I love my RCF's and wouldn't put anyone off buying a pair.
Has no one mentioned FBT's? Great powered boxes imo.
“A composer is a guy who goes around forcing his will on unsuspecting air molecules, often with the assistance of unsuspecting musicians.”
SSD Dual drive MBP, VCI100SE, 2 MF's, Audio 8, Echo Audiofire 2, 2x1200's, CDJ800s, Novation Twitch, XoneS2, X1, tons of PA Gear.
I agree, but I was talking QSC, not peavey. What I'm wondering is the QSC vs EV and/or RCF. From my experience and the word of everyone I've heard (with you being the first exception), the QSC's are on par or better than RCF's comparable series, but easily get the edge due to the 6 year warranty. As for EV, while definitely a great speaker that is above most, it isn't on the same level... though not by much.
The Peavey/JBL was just a comparison. The fact of the matter is that they latter two brands offer a beefier HF section and back them up with a larger power reserve. The specs back up my real word experience, which is that the QSC will have a less pleasing tone at higher volumes.
You know what, forget it, the RCF and EV mentioned both sell for twice the price of a K12.
I'm talking KW series and/or HPR. What kind of SPL ratings are you seeing on those EV's and RCF's?
RCF claims 130dB on the 722-A.
EV claims 133dB on the ZXA5.
My ears tell me both are smoking loud, much louder than the K series, which makes sense if it costs half the price. Haven't hear the KW series, specs seem good, would love to hear them.
I think that's where there's some confusion. I would never rate those K series against what your talking about. I'm using the KW and to a lesser extent, the HPR series. Not a fan of the K series, though they are great for wedding type stuff since they are so light.
Exactly, K series was definitely built to meet a price point.
Haha, friends?
Can we hug?
|
Bookmarks