
Originally Posted by
keeb
What I'm saying is I'll leave the older generation to appreciate Sneak. And yeah, I'm at least semi-familiar with all of those names, Keith. I haven't been around EDM for decades, but I've made an effort to brush up on the history. Maybe I'm just not down with Sneak's sound, or I don't appreciate him given the lack of context, but what I've seen of him mixing didn't really impress... I don't know what to tell you. While I don't agree with much of what comes out of Joel's mouth these days, he does have a point; Sneak doesn't seem to be very relevant in 2012 and I could easily see an artist in a position like he is railing against the current state of house (as so many DJs do) simply to gain more contemporary exposure. Simple incentives, really; Sneak "keeps it real" while generating free, easy publicity.
Say what you will about DJMag's top 100, but with deadmau5 at #5 and DJ Sneak not even making the cut - there's at least a bit of evidence to support my theory that about contemporary relevance and that Sneak could potentially gain from this kind of exposure. How many people reading those tweets do you think have a clue who DJ Sneak is (hint: Sneak has 25k twitter followers, Deadmau5 has 1.75 million)?
Nevermind the fact that Sneak's stance (at least as described by Zimmerman in the interview - feel free to let us know if he was making that up/taking it out of context) is anachronistic at best. Sure, we should appreciate house music's roots and we should endeavor to uphold the standard of excellence that's been passed down. However, clinging firmly to past ideas only serves to stagnate musical progress and innovation; and coming from someone you laud as a pioneer, it seems... odd, to say the least. It seems like he's either after publicity as I mentioned above, or is actually afraid of change making him irrelevant. Or mau5 made it up...?
Bookmarks