Any other midi experts out there who feel like the million varieties of "dj controllers" out there is just overkill? Let me explain what I mean. I'm coming from the perspective of someone who builds and uses custom maps, so the out-of-the-box functionality doesn't mean jack to me. I could take three controllers and make them all do exactly the same thing. It's just midi, after all. So after that, what's left to distinguish any of these machines from one another? To me the only things that matter are:
Feel of controls and build quality
Does it have any special type of transmission (timecode, OSC, HID, or hi-def midi)?
Does it have any unique controls (endless encoders, ribbons, etc)?
Does it have enough controls?
I don't know, I guess I'm just talking out loud to think it through. Seems like everyone gets all fired up to sell old stuff and buy new stuff, and I'm just kicking back thinking "what's wrong with your old stuff? you can program it to do everything the new stuff does". If its cause someone hates the build quality or whatever, I get it, but I'm bummed seeing people get excited about things like factory installed 4 deck switching on a controller with two channel faders, like it's a new innovation or something. DIY, baby.
Here's what I want to see:
1) A mid sized controller with a ton of buttons, faders, and endless encoders with leds, without a soundcard. But most importantly, I want each control module (fx area, eq area, transport, etc) to have a number of banks, stored in memory, that send a different set of messages depending on which bank you're in. I want the banks to be progammable, and stored in memory. This way, YOU get to define what and how the controller sends info.
2) A hi-end midi enabled mixer surface with a built in sound card that takes digital input via the card but sums it in the analog domain.
Bookmarks