Whats the deal with CDJs? - Page 2
Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 54
  1. #11
    Tech Mentor
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    7,260 ft.
    Posts
    249

    Default

    They look and feel far more legit. They are robust and autonomous. And the farther you can get from directly playing computers, the better off you are. But mostly, they just feel better.

  2. #12
    Tech Guru
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Wollongong, NSW, Australia
    Posts
    664

    Default

    I think CDJ's are great (only used Pioneer). Very intuitive and the 2000's at least feel very natural to mix on going between vinyl and USB. The gripe I have with the kit is the price. 2000 plus dollars for one is out of my price range. Traktor with DVS takes up less space and money for my home set up as I already have 1200's. I spin mostly vinyl now so I'm not fussed with bringing my sound card and laptop out and instead just rekord box some tunes onto a usb and play off the cdj's.

    I'm interested in what Pioneer will do with the 850. If the price is right and the features are there I might get a set. I'm not a big fan of the A10's phono pre amps.

  3. #13
    Tech Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    São Paulo - Brazil
    Posts
    778

    Default

    Without Rekordbox CDJs are the most reliable equipment for DJing.
    13" Macbook Air i7, 8GB RAM, 512GB SSD | Traktor 2.7.1 | Ableton Live 9 | DJM-900 Nexus | NI Audio 10 | A&H Xone:K2 | Oyaide USB & RCA | HDJ-2000 | Odyssey BRLDIGITAL Bag

  4. #14
    Tech Guru William Gibson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    ChiCompton
    Posts
    533

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Student View Post
    Another point is; DJ's should be able to DJ by listening. Most new DJ's who start out DJ'ing don't do this by listening but by visualizing through their screens. They see whether tracks are matched or not. The actual sound doesn't matter anymore. That is becoming a bigger and bigger problem.
    Not to get off on a wild tangent but saying just because DJ's Now a days visualize stuff and that's a "problem", is a pretty bold statement. I started DJ'ing a little over a year ago on some shitty numark CDJs. I had no music background, everything I read about song structure and things like phrasing didn't make much sense to me and learning was going very slow. It wasn't until I picked up a copy of Live and visually saw these beats, bars and the whole song structures that everything clicked. I think I learned more about DJing and put more songs together better that first week with Live then I did the several months with just the CDJs. I'm a visual learner, to say that learning this way is detrimental to the DJ community as a whole is pretty absurd, IMO.

    Just my .02

  5. #15
    Tech Guru
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Wollongong, NSW, Australia
    Posts
    664

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by William Gibson View Post
    Not to get off on a wild tangent but saying just because DJ's Now a days visualize stuff and that's a "problem", is a pretty bold statement. I started DJ'ing a little over a year ago on some shitty numark CDJs. I had no music background, everything I read about song structure and things like phrasing didn't make much sense to me and learning was going very slow. It wasn't until I picked up a copy of Live and visually saw these beats, bars and the whole song structures that everything clicked. I think I learned more about DJing and put more songs together better that first week with Live then I did the several months with just the CDJs. I'm a visual learner, to say that learning this way is detrimental to the DJ community as a whole is pretty absurd, IMO.

    Just my .02
    It can definitely help using the wave forms to understand song structure. Doing it blind after you understand it can sharpen your skills even further and really get you feeling the musical changes.
    Last edited by LoopCat; 12-08-2013 at 10:41 PM.

  6. #16
    Tech Mentor
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    369

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by William Gibson View Post
    Not to get off on a wild tangent but saying just because DJ's Now a days visualize stuff and that's a "problem", is a pretty bold statement. I started DJ'ing a little over a year ago on some shitty numark CDJs. I had no music background, everything I read about song structure and things like phrasing didn't make much sense to me and learning was going very slow. It wasn't until I picked up a copy of Live and visually saw these beats, bars and the whole song structures that everything clicked. I think I learned more about DJing and put more songs together better that first week with Live then I did the several months with just the CDJs. I'm a visual learner, to say that learning this way is detrimental to the DJ community as a whole is pretty absurd, IMO.

    Just my .02
    Sure, to some level it can definitely help you understand music better. But let me just take the screen away from you, how are you doing now? If you want to learn something, you have to learn the basics. Beatmatching without a screen while riding the pitch should def be one of those basics.

    You've learned something from your screen, good for you! Now take it away and learn even more!

  7. #17
    Tech Guru
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    991

    Default

    Screw your vinyl, I play all my tracks with a 32-piece orchestra in a room with specially designed acoustic properties. If I have to change the speed, I have to instruct 32 people to do so in unison. Sure, to some level having your music recorded in an easy format for one person to play can definitely help you understand how to rock a party, but let me just take that vinyl away from you, how are you doing now? Yeah you can't conduct an orchestra for toffee can you?

    What I'm trying to say is, saying he'd be screwed if he had to DJ with the standard of two decades ago is a moot point, because it isn't two decades ago, it's today. This is DJ Techtools, not DJ Yesterdaytools, so lets not get into a bashing session over irrational arguments.

    Back on topic, the deal with CDJs is simple, they were created to adapt the benefits of CDs into the DJing world. Pioneer, not keeping up with the very quickly advancing laptop DJ market (It was adopted waaaaay faster than the CDJs were) developed a genius marketing plan and made the CDJ what is referred to as a "Veblen good", which essentially means it can command a high price because it then carries an "elite" status. Not only do they not have to sell as many, they also earn titles like "Professional" and "Industry standard" which then makes them sell more. Also, almost every big name DJ/venue is given a CDJ set up for free. One example of this is Zedd, who started making waves and touring the festival circuit using Traktor and an S4, then when he was getting higher up the festival slot, he tweeted a picture of a brand new nexus set up that Pioneer had given to him. There are hundreds of DJs who are bigger or comparable to Zedd, so you can imagine how many units Pioneer give away to make sure they maintain their status whilst they try to catch up to the controller market.

    Which they are doing quite well! The DDJ-SX is undoubtedly one of the best controllers you can buy, and whilst expensive, for once with Pioneer you're actually getting what you pay for. Also they've pre-empted the upcoming tablet DJ movement by making the recordbox app compatible with the nexus range. Why bother taking your controller when you can take just your tablet, right?

    Seriously, Pio's marketing division deserves all the blowjobs and cookies that it gets. The biggest lie that people believe is that CDJs and controllers are different, when they aren't. They're both a series of components and buttons that play a music file, whether it be WAV, MP3, whatever.

    You play for yourself and your audience, it doesn't matter what you use.
    Kontrol S4Senn HD 25-1Kontrol F1

  8. #18
    Tech Guru johney's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Slovakia
    Posts
    704

    Default

    if i'd want to nitpick, i'd say controllers don't play anything, they're just an interface for your computer

  9. #19
    Tech Mentor
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    369

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sambo View Post
    Screw your vinyl, I play all my tracks with a 32-piece orchestra in a room with specially designed acoustic properties. If I have to change the speed, I have to instruct 32 people to do so in unison. Sure, to some level having your music recorded in an easy format for one person to play can definitely help you understand how to rock a party, but let me just take that vinyl away from you, how are you doing now? Yeah you can't conduct an orchestra for toffee can you?

    What I'm trying to say is, saying he'd be screwed if he had to DJ with the standard of two decades ago is a moot point, because it isn't two decades ago, it's today. This is DJ Techtools, not DJ Yesterdaytools, so lets not get into a bashing session over irrational arguments.
    I get what your saying, but the harsh truth is that if you want to be taken serious and want regular club gigs or even at festivals you'll need to learn how to operate CDJ's. There are actually festivals here in the Netherlands where they forbid the winners of DJ-contests who can play opening slots to use laptops.

    That being said; I own the SX and love it to death! Play three gigs a week with em yet I'd still rather have 3 CDJ2K's and a DJM900... They're just more fun

  10. #20
    Tech Guru
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    leicester. uk.
    Posts
    789

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ConnectControl View Post
    Aside from the obvious fact that they're still the industry standard in clubs, which I get... Whats the appeal? For instance why would a new DJ go for the vastly bulkier and more expensive CDJs with an external mixer over say an all in one digital controller?
    CDJ's are industry standard, and unless your playing big clubs, the dj booths aren't gonna be massive meaning there isn't that much room for someone with a controller, it's easier to rock up with some cd's/usb and play, no messing about.

    The size of controllers is more of an issue than size of CDJ's and a mixer, unless your a mobile DJ where it could be a plus.

    Personally I've never really enjoyed playing on CDJ's, do ocassionally play on them but only the odd track, but I would rather play on CDJ's than a controller.

    The cost is probably why a lot of new dj's aren't going for CD's/Turntables, as yes it's a big first investment. But it will benefit you in the long run, especially if you do want to play clubs etc

    Personally I'll be sticking with two turntables and a mixer.
    Technics 1210 MK2 x 2 / A&H Xone:22 / Shure M35S / Urbanears Zinken / Mukatsuku Record Weights x 2 / Vinyl
    iMac / Ableton Live 8 / Reason / Akai EIE Pro / Adam A5x / Boss BX 800 / Soundcraft EPM6 / MFB 522 / Korg Monotribe / Maschine Mikro MK1 / NI Kontrol X1 MK1 / Akai APC 20 / Novation Remote 25sl Compact

Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •