and? i don´t get what the lesson behind this would be. there thousands of songs out the with the excact same pattern. sorry but imho this isn´t even worth to start a new thread…
what is your problem, man? i think we´ve been over this debate several times and i´d say that in fact the idiot is you for starting a thread so meaningless and with no good intentions at all. very helpful to the community as well…
As for the drop, suspect this was done in Ableton Live or something similar so it’s not that hard to calculate the pauses and with grid help and tempo automation figure out how things sound smooth. I was hoping this was a live DJ event or something similar, that’s where this talent would have been true.
Some return 70 with Traktor, some not. I recommend doing a little bit more extensive testing than using one single dubstep track – assuming you own more than one dubstep track of course.
Always a solid strategy to feel useful, try to make yourself seem smarter than other people by starting a topic with a counter argument to an argument that wasn’t brought up. As if your other threads on this weren’t enough. Go find something better to do or preach to people who care.
I don’t really understand the point here. Dubstep is typically 140-150 BPM. If it comes up as 70 or 75, it’s because the transient detection in (insert DVS here) is pretty crap. Any person who vindictively says dubstep is 70 BPM is a twat who doesn’t understand rhythm structure. /thread
see why I am frustrated. I am a DJ and a drummer and I use to dance as well. I know rhythm very well. If you isolate the dubstep drums, that is a slow tempo beat, around 60-80 BPM. the snare is on 2 and 4. Just beacuse you set FL studio to 140 BPM and place your snares on 3 doesn’t mean you can change centuries of music theory. Placing the snares on 3 is incorrect. That would mean your 1/8ths are now 1/16ths and your 1/32’s are now 1/64’s etc. that’s incorrect.