Somebody told me one of my mixes was really good but that the transitions were too simple, which I dont really know what they mean by that but what do you guys think? I dont do intro outro mixing which is what I consider simple
Heres the mix they were talking about for reference:
Nope. Sometimes the best thing to do is to K.I.S.S.
I didn’t listen to the mix, but you can make it as simple or complicated as you want, and if one person doesn’t like it, well then you can’t please everyone!
same here, I think effects and all that over the transitions might be a little too much. Craziest i get with stuff like that is the occasional delay, echo, or reverb and sometimes I grab a loop and close it smaller and smaller while taking it out
Honestly, on the whole, I much prefer listening to “simple” mixes where you can’t tell between two tracks, rather than getting fancy with it. Honestly.
It’s the same way while I enjoy a good scratching session, it really has to be phenomenal for me to get down with it. If you’re going to mix, K.I.S.S. is really the truth.
Sounds good man, maybe your friend said simple by really short mixes, you seem to mix from breakdown to breakdown for the first 10 minutes as I didn’t listen to it fully but it sounds flawless. Simple is always better
Much agreed! Most of my mix tapes are “simple” transitions. Mostly because when I learn’t to mix, that’s about all you could do with two tables and some Trance music!
I’m always asking myself if I could inject some more effects / controllerist magic into my sets, but at the end of the day, if your playing in a club environment, most of the punters just want to get drunk and have a dance, and won’t be interested if your beatmashing hot cues. Just that the music’s banging!
i also like mixing which is not so much “cock in face” like when you can get lost into the music without getting my attention drawed away from the dj’s ego
and a dj which don’t need five EFX on top of each other to mask his trainwreck is nothing bad ^^
I’ll take a listen to this when I get off work. I’m in Miami also, and the majority of sets I hear in clubs are simple mixes, because that’s what people want to dance to…and really that’s what the promoters want. A packed club with people dancing, not an over the top effects show. However, you can still keep it interesting by keeping a loop going on on the outgoing tracks, or like you said the occasional delay - freeze, or the loops being cut down. I some times will start the vocals of the incoming track on a 4 to 8 bar loop of the outgoing track and then cut them down as the vocals build up to create a bigger build up…the crowd can’t tell if that’s a loop or a build up. I think if do things like that sparringly it stands out much more…but for 75% of my sets, just transitions in phrase and keep them dancing.
My opinion is that mixing is a means to an end. The end is preserving the flow of the mix. This means a lot of ‘subtractive’ mixing (EQ, Filter, Echo Freeze) and not a lot of ‘additive’ mixing (rolls, beatslicer). You just need to file the edges off the tunes to make 'em fit. Maybe a snatch of vocal or a percussion loop (if they’re complimentary).
Since starting to DJ, I’ve noticed that I appreciate simple mixes a lot more than sets filled with FX. I used to think it was the coolest thing when a DJ did it, but being on the other side of the decks now I can see through it all. Just recently heard a mix where the DJ brought every song in by scratching it in, used an airhorn every minute of every track, and transitioned using spinbacks. It was honestly the most frustrating thing. For me, simple is the best, shows that you don’t need to hide behind bad effects when transitioning, and it will be much more respected among other DJs.
Apart from the rest here I actually do like to hear some tricking around in a set. As basically any ape can make a decent recording these days, this is a way for me to hear if a DJ is truly talented or not.
But still, track selection is way more important.