Techniques to make your mix feel more consistent

Okay…for specific suggestions.

  1. It’s all about song selection.

If your tracks are good for the night and for your set, everything else is just icing. Get to the point where you can mix a coherent set with just song selection and volume faders (or crossfader if you prefer) before you add anything or you’re going to be fighting with advanced techniques you can’t understand because you don’t know the basics.

I believe this advice holds regardless of what equipment you use.

  1. EQs are effects.

Don’t use them until you can mix a set. Then, start using them to fix errors that you hear. At first, you’ll probably just use the bass EQ to keep basslines and kicks from laying on top of each other. Most of the time, it’s because they’re clashing or just taking up too much dynamic range and dominating the mix.

Eventually, you’ll hear that other elements tend to dominate the mix…and EQs are primarily used to fix those problems in a way that’s a bit more precise than just volume controls.

You can also use them entirely as effects, primarily to build or relieve tension. IMHO, that’s more advanced and shouldn’t be attempted until you figure it out on your own. If you really want advice, go back a little while on the DJTT blog and watch the videos about Isolators. They’re really not that different from EQs…the biggest thing is that they affect the master. Yes, the bands are wider, but it doesn’t really matter.

Personally, I think those examples were horrible. The Derrick May one was probably the best in my opinion, but I kind of think the track would have been better if left alone.

I’ve walked out on DJs for doing shit like that and fully support that decision.

  1. Effects are never necessary.

Use them very sparingly. If you want a flanger sound, find a song with that sound in it. If you want a filter sweep to build tension, find a track that already has it. Figure out how they’re used in production environments first, then think about maybe adding some. It’s really easy to overdo effects, especially when your only option in the DJ booth is to apply them to full songs (or use something like Ableton and play multitracks of your own songs).

  1. Mind the Chorus

Every song has something like a chorus. In hip hop and top40, they’re really apparent. In house, they can be obvious. In a lot of EDM–especially non-vocal stuff–they hide. But they’re still there. Don’t mix chorus to chorus…mix chorus to verse or chorus to bridge (aka, breakdown). Verse to verse usually causes problems, but it’s probably not a bad idea if you can talk about why you’re choosing to do it that way.

  1. Don’t do anything if you can’t articulate why you’re doing it.

If you don’t know why you’re doing something, just don’t do it…it will do more harm than good. Do you know why you’re swapping basslines during a transition? Because you thought that was the way it’s done………nope. Stop doing it until you hear a need for it, and then figure out why you think you need that.

I think that applies to everything.

  1. Don’t chase technology.

You don’t have to have the best, most up-to-date anything. Most new stuff isn’t much better than the last revision, and if you haven’t mastered your old tools, there’s no reason to add more. The exception to this one is if you just want to make a change or you find something that solves some problem that you’ve been having and not been able to solve.

  1. Don’t add things to a mix because you’re bored.

All it does is ruin music. If you’re bored with your music, either concentrate on your paycheck or spin music you actually like. If you’re spinning music that bores you for free…take a serious look about where your career is and figure out if what you’re doing is going to get you to where you want to be. If it is, focus on the end point. If not, drop it.

And because so many people do things like this without posting anything…here.

It’s old. I haven’t recorded anything in a long time for a number of reasons–which I’m fixing–but this mix illustrates what I’ve outlined above. I like the tracks and the style, though it might not be to your taste. What is apparent is how little “next level” techniques matter. No effects, no EQs, no volume faders anywhere in that mix (and no crossfader, either). No automation of any kind. It was done in Ableton, but all I did was set gain staging and launch and stop clips…including the mashup like 2/3 of the way through it.

It may not be your taste, as I was trying something weird with housey vocals over nu-skool breaks, but it flows well without any of the crap that people think is necessary.

In the end, DJing is just song selection and phrasing. Everything else is sugar.

Good point. My latest is in my sig and is a good example of good long smooth mixing with lots of EQ’ing to balance stuff out and minimal FX usage.

https://soundcloud.com/photojojo/beat-infectious-with-chris-4

@mostapha - great post

A good tip I only recently figured out (still mastering proper EQing, some tracks are just too strangely mastered for me) is that proper mids EQing is a good way to change focus between two songs similar to just changing over the bass. That way you bring in the 2nd track at a lower level on the mids, and switch it out when you feel appropriate, then play it out for a little longer until you switch out the bass. If it’s done right it provides some nice tension as well as a smooth transition that isn’t obnoxious.

Edit: Also, if you find you like a song, but it needs some spicing up, you can TASTEFULLY apply an acapella to it. Don’t just slap a random hip hop vocal or pop sample down unless it makes sense. Especially if there’s a lot already going on in the song it may just be better to leave it alone, I’ve just found with certain songs that are either repetitive, or just have a good amount of “empty space” to play with (situations like a song cutting to nothing for a beat for tension, where it’s not hard to mix something creatively into), acapella’s can almost make the song sound like an entirely different track.

Yeah…don’t use a’capellas unless the other track is essentially just a beat and has a lot of room. Also, cut the mids just a bit (-3dB gives a surprising amount of room).

And one other thing…if you have access to xone-style EQs, the high-mid is great at emphasizing/de-emphasizing snares and hats. It’s the thing I’m going to miss most in moving away from both A&H and Traktor.

This.

I’m just now beginning to feel out how to keep everything consistent and well-blended, and I’ve found the best way to do that is make sure your phrasing is on point. When I listen to EDM, I expect a change in the music, however subtle, between 8 and 16 bars. So if you’re doing your transitions in between then, it should help keep the consistency. I just got done with a hardstyle mix today (link is in my sig) and was very happy with how it turned out, mainly because I was focusing a lot on the phrasing. I’ve also found that when listening back, if it sounds like one long continuous song as opposed to you actively paying attention to when the music transitions, you’ve got a good grasp on phrasing. Basically for me when it becomes background noise, I did a good job :slight_smile:

get yourself a set of go-to “transition” samples; white noise, reverse cymbals etc. etc. and start getting a feel for them when you transition. you’ll quickly get to know what samples work with which tracks/sounds, and you’d be surprised how often they can cover up less than stellar transitions :wink:

It works a lot better to use the transitional elements that are already in tracks. They’ve been eq’d and compressed to fit better than you can do with dj gear and are already where they’re supposed to be.

Only add them after you’ve figured out how to mix without adding them.

Newbie here, few questions for u advanced DJ’s about this thread, sorry if they seem totally dumb.

so 4 beats is a bar, 4/8/16 bars are phrases?! right or wrong?

To mix in the next new song, u hit the first beat of a new phrase?

Also, how can u tell when a new phrase has started?

Phrases in dance music tend to be 8 measures. Exceptions are few and far between. And you eventually just hear them.

Start by listening for in-track transitions. They come at phrase changes, though not every phrase change. They’re things like drum fills, crashes, filter sweeps. They signify a “big” change or the introduction/removal of some significant element.

They’re also the easiest places to mix. When something big changes towards the end of a tralc, it’s usually the removal of something that really defines the track, vocals, lead synth, bassline, the low/sub part of a kick. A phrase change with an in-track transition that removes something like that is the best place for a new track to take over with one of its big, defining elements coming in.

If you listen to that mix i posted above, that’s literally all it is. Drops were lined up to take over right when a big element from the outgoing track stopped. Even if it’s obvious tht it’s a new track, it happens at a time that makes sense with the structure of both songs and winds up very musical.

If there’s any question in your mind, trance is full of them. A lot of techno and minimal changes are a lot more subtle, but they’re still there.

When you’re mixing live, you have to know your tracks well enough that you can anticipate these changes. I helps that they’re almost all built on 8-bar phrases. and waveform overviews can help remind you what’s coming, but you can’t use them exclusively with most stuff.

Ableton’s waveforms are detailed enough that you can mix entirely by looking at them, but it’s dangerous and really makes you know what different elemnts look lik. SSL, Itch, Traktor, CDJs, a d even the grooves on a record all help a great deal, especially if you know the format and the track well enough to know where phrase changes should be…you can count phrases to where you want the mix to happen, and it makes it a lot easier to know when to start the next track and how long you have to do whatever you’re going to do before the new track needs to be fully open and the old track needs to be quiet enough to not eat up all of your dynamic range.

EQing is a horrible, horrible way to “force” a track’s structure to fit when you’ve screwed up phrasing, and that’s where “techniques” like swapping basslines came from.

If you’re doing it for artistic reasons, sweet. If you’re doing it to fix a mistake…sometimes it’s necessary, but really it means you need more practice.

Remember Kidz, a legless WW2 hurricane pilot ones said when told he’d never walk without crutches, let alone pilot a fighter aircraft… “Rules are for the guidance of wise men and the obediance of fools”

Dont be scared of tearing up the rule book when ye just know its gonna sound right.

Absolutely, but have a reason to do so. These rules have been honed over decades or centuries of DJing and music. They’re there for a reason, so don’t break them just because you don’t know them or think they’re too hard…have an artistic reason.

Anyone could be a savant, but if someone who’s been DJing 6 months wants to throw out everything, it’s much more likely to sound like garbage than to be the next big technique.

Practicing harmonic mixing will help a lot too :slight_smile:

That’s one thing i DONT agree on, according to Camelot system none of my stuff should work … ('cough you lot before any of you say “they dont” :stuck_out_tongue: )

Camelot / mixing in key is a tool, not the be all and end all, it is however a great tool if used inteligently.
But above all use the supercomputer in your skull and the two finely tuned instruments strapped to each side of it above all else

Or do break them…your call.

http://www.zefrank.com/theshow/archives/2006/07/071406.html

Happy ugly!

Just be aware that you first must KNOW the rules AND have more than one option…THEN you get to make a choice. Until you know the rules and have more than one option at every given moment…you’re just making more ugly for the world.

Harmonic mixing doesn’t necessarily = the camelot system

Exactly, hence the “Guidance of wise men” portion of the quote…