
Originally Posted by
nem0nic
They CHOOSE substance. I use Windows because I work for a living. I can not afford downtime. It's been my professional experience that the computing markets Apple has FAILED to penetrate are the ones requiring uptime and absolute reliability. No one's using XServe (that's why it's now dead). When the industry demands reliability, the apps are running in Windows or a *nix variant. If you're in a professional recording studio, chances are you'll run into an older Mac running an older version of ProTools. But recording doesn't require 100% uptime. But the software that handles the radio station playback automation DOES, and it's running in Windows. You'll find Apple computers in the graphics department of a TV network, but only in creation. The systems that deliver those stills to air are running Windows. The switcher that cuts to that graphic is running Windows. The servers from which the video gets played back, and the computers running Newscutter are all Windows computers. You'll find the same kind of results when looking at other industries where uptime and reliability are important (from healthcare to traffic management to web servers). If OSX is so clearly superior, why did Apple just give up on their servers? Why isn't anyone using them?
Style over substance.
Bookmarks