one more. SOLID ! :
>
both those are classics and still get the crowd in a frenzy.....+2
I like this game.
Got to number 2 in the UK charts.
CLUB OF JACKS - RELEASES >>TRAXSOURCE
Club of Jacks are a London based House & Garage production / DJ duo with releases on a number of underground labels including Plastik People Recordings, Blockhead Recordings, Hi Energy!, Pocket Jacks Trax, Soul Revolution Records and their own Club of Jacks imprint.
#1 in the Irish Charts for 10 weeks ... we win
In answer to the OP - crap for the masses IMHO is "music with little or no artistic merit created with the sole aim of money over quality"
Last edited by deevey; 06-25-2012 at 07:53 PM.
i would somewhat agree with this, but at the same time there are people who love that music and many people at that. for them it is the farthest possible point from crap. so although the sole intention may have been money, it is still serving people well. i personally almost never say that something sucks or that it is crap because there is almost always going to be someone that loves it. in my eyes there are times for constructive criticism though, when new musicians are looking for feedback on technical issues in their works. outside of technical mistakes and maybe glaring key/writing issues most everything artistically related is almost entirely subjective.
i don't like a lot of songs, but that doesn't mean they are crap.
Last edited by squidot; 06-25-2012 at 08:21 PM. Reason: grammer as usual
tsp 2.5 | vci-400 ege | mfspectra | kontrol x1s | rokit 8s (ferrari grey) | krk 10 sub | audio 8hp dv6 - i5 - 8gb | maschine | mpk49 | apc40 | rokit 5s | technics sl-1200mk3ds | cdj100sthread of free music
Ok, that is one definition of "crap for the masses". Along with....
The original idea that was being copied was also quite popular, wasn't it? Otherwise it wouldn't be copied right? So wasn't the original idea or art form crap too, because it was popular? Or was it so crappy that soooo many people liked it and because it was so successful (but crappy too), people also wanted to produce more crap? I don't get it.
Anyway.....
Can anyone put up some clear examples of these definitions? Then we can see who actually thinks it is poor and why.
scamo
Skooppa - the revolution is beginning!
You want the best FX jogs on the S4? Then try this mapping!
Our Mixes: Mixcloud - Soundcloud
Hehe...yeah. We're just beginning.
Hows this?
Original=
Crap for the masses=
Now, as to whether or not the original is crap or not....![]()
Intoxicated /adj./ When you feel sophisticated without being able to pronounce it.
facebook.com/DJJakeLake
jakelake.info
If popularity and/or commercial success were actual indicators for quality, McDonalds had to be selling the best food in the world...
Or to put it somewhat different with the words of Mark Twain:
"Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time to pause and reflect."
This.
And as to squidot's reply I'd like to refer to my first statement in this post and add: just because somebody likes it doesn't mean it's not crap.
Sorry if I have to disappoint you, but Avicii is exactly what people mean when they are talking about "crap for the masses" in EDM.
So let me fix this for you:
Original=
Crap for the masses=
Some clown, who is even considered crap by people who else mistake crap for originality=
[/QUOTE]
Well, i think you said it yourself. "My opinion is better than yours/Everyone has their own tastes and opinions." It aint no mo than that, it´s the same all the time, have ya ever heard the good old "haters gonna hate"? and oh, just got this in my mind, i think it´s a kind of a meme, like, a social phenomen, its COOL to be hating on some pretty damn good music(because it´s popular).
Dunno, but still...
|
Bookmarks