Simple LED question re: Beat Jump on APC40

[shanefontane]

So, this is what I would like:

Button 1
Beat Jump -4
not active= no led
on push= orange

Button 2
Beat Jump +4
not active= no led
on push= orange

but when i program this Button 1 works fine BUT once I program button 2 they seem to interact with one another. For example, if I push button 2 then button 1 lights up orange. If I push button 1 then button 2 lights up orange.

If I remove the Beat Jump OUT settings for the LED then both operate as expected in green instead of orange.

Ideas?

[keeb]

Try inverting the output and see if that fixes it.

[shanefontane]

thanks. will try.

[shanefontane]

nope. didnt work. they still interact with each other

[bartboy]

Set the controller range to 5 and 5 with blend on should do it. I'm pretty sure that 5 is for orange let me know if that doesn't do it. You may need to also add in a send monitor state function but I am not 100% about that one.

[shanefontane]

i can get this to work IF it's orange when and when not pressed...

[bartboy]

So it stays a solid orange? Hmm not sure I'll have a look at mine today and see if I can't get it working I'll post later if I find anything.

[shanefontane]

yeah. thanks for all your help.

not sure why I couldn't get it to behave the way I initially wanted but I ran with it and added more functionality which works just great.

As of current,

Beat Jump 4m (fwd or bk)
Default=no led
On-click=green led

Shift+Beat Jump 32m (fwd or bk)
Default=no led
On-click=green led

Deck is Playing
Beat Jump buttons double as green Beat Phase Monitor while still retaining Beat Jump functionality.

[BradCee]

not sure why I couldn't get it to behave the way I initially wanted

even though its two separate buttons, they both will outputting for that single function - beatjump

edit; having said that, you could have swapped the output mappings, when you think about it

[shanefontane]

even though its two separate buttons, they both will outputting for that single function - beatjump

edit; having said that, you could have swapped the output mappings, when you think about it

ahhh... this makes sense now. thanks for clearing that up.