Hi guys! I know we primarily deal with digital tech here, but I also know that many of us started out with analog, so I'm leaning on your wisdom here!
I'm a bedroom DJ. I have a small (but growing) collection of about 60+ records that I love to enjoy on my current set of Stanton tables. They are the STR8-30 model that I purchased in 2004. They're just basic tables that do only what I need, play vinyl. Unfortunately it seems they are dying, as they are unable to keep a solid BPM anymore. So I'm shopping for some new tables to replace my 14-year old ones.
So my budget for a pair of tables is $600. I don't want to spend any more than $300 per table, and given that I'm a bedroom DJ that doesn't travel or do gigs, that seems like a reasonable budget to me. I strictly play trance/techno/house music so scratching is not a priority.
I'm looking on Amazon at two sets of tables and I can't decide which I should buy. There's the Audio Technica LP120-USB for $299 each, and the Stanton T92USB for $239 each, and also the Stanton T92-MKII for $299 each, but I'm not sure why I would purchase the MKII over the AT-LP120USB.
Now everything I have seen online points as the AT LP120-USB. Everyone is saying that AT makes a better table overall. That I cannot argue. I totally agree. But I wonder if that higher level of quality matters to someone like me. I mean, I just used a pair of Stanton STR8-30's for 14 years after all. The feature list between the three of them is similar. I prefer the modern looks of the Stanton line (and the T92's are $120 cheaper) so I'm not sure if the extra price for the AT's is worth the money considering I won't be playing professionally.
What do you guys think? Should I pay an extra $60 (per table) for the AT's? Or should I save the extra money for vinyl and be just fine with the Stanton tables?
Bookmarks