Finding out the mix point?

Finding out the mix point?

Hi everyone,

Happy new year and I hope you are all well?

Ive got a question regarding mixpoints, Ive been mixing for many years but cant get my mixes to roll like the mixes i listen to on mixcloud or live within a club environment.

I understand the whole phrase mixing scenario but whenever i use specific points it dosent roll as id like?

How do you people work out those smooth transitions mixpoints?

I mix deep/tech house.

Any tips or advice would be great.

Thanks

James

many years?

you would understand where and when to start the next record…

At the very least you should be able to look at a record/wav form and realize when and where the tracks gets louder…

In his defence, I think he knows when/where part, it’s just the finesses that trouble him.
Some thing I learned long time ago when I started the transition from bedroom into clubs:

  • things are less obvious when you’re just the listener (even if you know the tracks that are being mixed)
  • loud volume in clubs also “kills” our ability to recognize what’s going on in the sound
  • club DJ’s tend to, week after week, use songs that they know will fit together
  • online mixes are more often than not very well reharsed if they are live (very careful track selection that goes well into each other) or are even studio/software produced (like the live mixes only + EQ-ing, compression, phrasing adjusted, some parts perfectly looped, chopped, synced)

My point - don’t worry about it, practice and experiment with tracks.

Exactly. To get more of a feel (and a better perspective on how “perfect” a transition has to be), I’d recommend playing back2back with someone else. Always fun (when it works, doesn’t work with everyone, but when it does it’s ace).

I stand by my comment. You can read a wavform and look and see when there are changes/breaks in the track. Use your minute markers and do some simple math to help figure out mix spots.DJ101

All the above and then some.. I do know what your talking about. One very important thing is eq it’s very critical extremely and this brings into account headroom of the channels. One thing I’ve done recently it always mix with line faders at most 3/4 and eq at 12’oclock…

another thing not all dj programs are the same nor is the controller integration. I have learned to despise serato dj what sounds good coming out of the speakers and headphones doesn’t always sound good recorded. It is something that I noticed back before they offered their dvs Kit. I have raised the concern many times in forum and opened support tickets all with no good outcome. That’s on my ns6
To be exact the issue comes from the channel gain knob has no control over the actual gain within serato. I have tried with autogain on and off and have kind of figured out ways to correct it slightly. But sometimes tracks still sound as though they are being compressed and really efs up the volume

I load up traktor with my ns6, typhoon, z1, z2, and problem disappears.

So keep that all in mind make sure your track isn’t coming in hot without you even knowing it also don’t use keylock or key correction unless your mixing lossless tracks. It introduces phasing issues on the low end and in general makes mixes sound worse. This is a small annoying thing but it is what it is. To overcome the mixing of broad key ranges I suggest learning how pitching up or down changes keys and go from there. Also it is not just software that keylock does this on.
On that point a 224/256M4A(iTunes) track will be affected worse the. A 320mp3 however they are both affected by this.

Another thing if you are mixing some lossless with lossy mind your eq and gain extra carefully because they mix together differently due to the sound spectrum each represents.

If I think of more things I’ll let reply…

FWIW this same issue has bugged me lots

If that is a “101” skill, I’d love to hear which skills you think represent “201,” “301,” and “401.”

What if your spinning detroit techno or schranza tunes with no breakdown? Your comment assumes that every single track he plays has the same framework.

..

TBH burc. It takes practice. Take your 6 favorite tunes. Mix em back to back over and over until you find the perfect mix techniques. There is no one single technique since most songs are different.

Though, here are a few techniques to keep in mind:
Window mixing: Mixing during the breakdowns and buildups of tunes.
EQ Mixing: Slowly kill each eq on the previously playing tune leading up to the point of mixing into the next tune completely

Deep / Tech House Smoothing the Mix

Hey James - as a fellow Deep/Tech House guy, I think I know what you may be looking for. Something I recently discovered is the amount of looping that goes on during transitions. A good DJ/friend of mine really opened my eyes to this. He introduced me to 128 and 256 (example) beats vs a typical 16/32 beat mix.

First - build a playlist - check that keys and BPM are at least close and in the best order
Then - Start your fist track in your headphones and create a nice loop - 8-16-or 32 - Make sure it sounds nice.

Now - Take a breath - and take your time - and slowly bring the Loop into the empty space. Make mental note where you first heard the track through your monitors and where your line level was.
IMPORTANT - Keep track of the count!!!

An exercise I like to use is - Introduce a track over the course of 60 - 90-seconds!
Stop worrying about the intro vs. Outro of the track start making your own Super-Intros / Super-Outros with loops - Big - LONG LOOPS.

OK - NEXT - For your first mix - depending on “where” you are taking your audience, bring up your next track in your headphones - and - again - create a nice clean loop - you might need to scrub through the track to find something nice

Get your count going and start the next track on-beat with the volume level at ZERO - AND I like to set the BASS at 9 or 10:00 -
Now - Slowly - Slowly - Slowly, bring up the next track and make note - where - you FIRST hear it.
Check your Beat-match - and make sure your previous track has Plenty of time left - if NOT - Make a quick loop and let it ride.
Continue bringing the new track in with minimal BASS - then - when you are ready to mix and your levels are pretty equal

TRICKY PART - - now take a breath - get your count in your head - Ready to Mix?

  • Turn the BASS of your last BAR (all 4 Beats) Down to 9:00
    THEN - When your New Track starts its 1st Bar - Turn that BASS to 12:00 RIGHT WHEN THE NEXT BAR STARTS!!

FINAL - Now your new track has taken over and you can release the loop when you like
Now - Again - Slowly - Remove the 1st Track from the mix and make note where you LAST hear it through your monitors
NOTE: CONTINUE BEAT-MATCHING ON YOUR WAY OUT

I like to play with Gates/Delays and such on the OUT-Going track while the volume disappears

Hope that answered your question - of not - sorry - I’m snowed in and bored and felt like helping out a fellow Deep/Tech House Fan :slight_smile:

it’s one of the first things I learned after beatmatching and EQing…

It’s part of knowing your music. Is it not?

I have no problem correcting myself. Having a wav form to read is much easier than reading a piece of vinyl.
100 =signal routing and how to hook your shit up
101 = beat matching, eqing, knowing your music
201 = cohesive mixing techniques, record selection
301 = proper use of effects and loops
401 = scratching

pretty sure he’s not…

You are looking for changes in the music. You can see it in the wav forms. It doesn’t have to be a breakdown.

I suggest instead of looking at wave forms and looking at marker points you LISTEN to the music… It should come natural if you listen to what your playing and really feel it. If you play music you’re passionate about then practicing consistently will help you greatly.

I agree with you. AND the wav forms are visual indicators of what you are hearing and can be used as a tool to plan your mixes and mixing techniques.

Had to look up what “schranza” was…

You must not spend any time down at Dr. Freeclouds.

When I did buy vinyl it was the records shops on melrose and vinyl fetish on vermont…

If it’s electronic music odds are 8/16/32/64

Percussive elements in 8 more percussion at 16 maybe little synth at 32 big changes at 64

Almost always the case of you don’t believe me cue up a track and start putting in loops from first beat… Can almost gurentee you that at 32 or 64 intro is over…

Ears are top notch wave display is mediocre and not always reliable to go by but a good ball park

Again I street eq and volume post a mix and we will rip it apart for ya here I’ll start here’s last one I did deep/techy/proggy I’ve listened to it and can pick out lots of mixes I wasn’t happy with most simply volumes

https://soundcloud.com/mosesgonzales/a-progressive-kind-of-night-002

Alternatively you can ignore all of this and just use your experience and knowledge of phrasing and your tracks.

Its pretty easy just to ‘feel’ youve got a change coming up in 32 bars time.

So many approaches to DJing.

Arg! Sounds like the music I produced on Reason 1…

You are SPOILED with options for this in Traktor!!!

Find the mix out point on the waveform of the outgoing track (HINT: it will be where there is a crash, or a change in the music (maybe the bass will drop out, or the lyrics will disappear, or some crap like that)) then drop a cue marker there. You can even make it a Fade Out marker if you like.

Then, beatjump BACK the by the amount that you want your transition to last (HINT2: you’ll probably be going back by at least 1 Phrase, or likely 4, 8 or 16 bars) then drop another cue marker.

THEN, in your deck header, pick a slot to show “Beats to Cue”. When the play head reachers the first of your cue markers, it will start a countdown clock to the NEXT cue marker (shown in beats and bars).

Do this on the incoming track too (but at the beginning, instead of the end of the track) and you’ll know EXACTLY when to start and end blending the 2 tracks! Start track 2 from the first cue marker, exactly when track 1 reaches it’s first (of the 2) cue markers, and you’ve got yourself a lovely blend.

It’s algebra, really.