Practical difference between 2 and 4-channel mixers?

Practical difference between 2 and 4-channel mixers?

I know the obvious difference being, that a 4-channel mixer would have accses to two more channels and thus be able to have another pair of players connected to it, but is that really all you can do with a 4-channel mixer compared to a 2-channel? I’m a novice, but apparantly this question is so basic that you can’t even google on it. Is it just so that its convinient to have 4 channels instead of 2 that you always change cables on to hook up another pair of players whenever you feel to switch from say cd to vinyl? Or is there some more advantages?

no, that’s pretty much it…

majority of mixers have line/phono switches so could have 2xcdj and 2xtt linked in and switch the channel input…

horses for courses. Scratch mixers are 2 channel for the extra space, club mixers are usually 4 channel for the flexibility.

Also the features on 4 channel mixers tend to be nicer than those on 2 channels annoyingly.
The dnx1600 has separate channel and master VU meters while the dnx600 does not. Bad times :disappointed:

It does allow DJs to switch over much much much smoother.

Unless you’re a scratch dj make sure to buy a 4 channel mixer, somewhere down the line you’ll appreciate the bigger investment at first.

Why?

EDIT: Still too tired to read correctly

4 channels is really nice to have. I’ve been looking to upgrading from my RMX so i can have 4 dedicated volume faders. I don’t use sample decks because I like to grab loops from different songs and fx it and shit.

we run my traktor setup plus a pair of cdj’s through our '600. not practical/possible with a 2 channel mixer.

Ddm4000
go go

To put a finer point on the flexibility of 4 v. 2 is that you have more routing options for EFX units, signal sources (TT, CDJ, software or another computer). If the mixer is digital like the DNX1600/1700, Xone DB4 one can route audio bi-directionally, i.e. from laptop to mixer and back again allowing for some creative sound shaping. Depends on what you wish to do though i guess. I tend to think of mixers now-a-days as more of a spoke hub for audio than a way to pass signal from A to B. There are a number of videos for the 1700 and DB4 hi-lighting their ability to do unconventional routing.

I’d be interested in seeing that space monkey, care to share them?

Even if your not using the 3rd or 4th deck to do loops etc, its nice just to have a free deck there to cue upcoming tracks on and get a feel for them etc

For the DB4

around the 30sec mark. Though it doesn’t provide a specific example with sound the input matrix allows an instant routing path across 4 channels (not including the mic). So for instance, one could have DeckA in TP go into 2 channels each with an independent EFX, loop and filter processor. No mucking about in TP output settings or with RCA cables. I wonder what possibilities the Rec Out has if running an RCA to an input on the mixer…or if that could be routed via software settings on the DB4.

DNX1700 has an FX send that, from what I understand, can route to other channels as well as external units. Search for AGI Pro and DJ Mag videos on youtube for EFX overview.

Haven’t played with either mixer yet but will be in the market this Summer…
Anyone need to buy a kidney?

Holy
fucking
shit.

I want one.

that DB4 is so powerful I don’t think even the developers fully understand it.

4 channel mixers are nice but not many people use all 4 decks, 3 would be sufficient, for 4 decks internal mixing with a midi controller + soundcard can sometimes be easier as you dont need to do much setting up when you play out (4 sets of RCA’s to plug into the back of the mixer is a bit much haha)

Still easier than setting up a dvs with turntables :stuck_out_tongue:

4 channel mixers also mean that if one channel just dies (which can happen), you have others to choose from.

1 channel mixing is… tricky.

DB4 I cannot use due to lazy finger syndrome
my fingers would constantly be hitting shit I didnt mean to.