
Originally Posted by
ryansupak
Hi, I posted in the thread over there. I started doing the controller thing back in 2001-2002. I've written my own software, drivers, crazy templates, effects configurations, done controller mods, chopped up songs into a million triggerable phrases, the whole 9 yards. Before that I was doing the same thing with SP-808s (which is a pain in the ass, BTW). I've looked at all this stuff from every angle I can, and pondered it seriously for years.
My sincere belief is that the controllerism thing, for party or club DJing, is a dead end. In the end, people want to hear tracks they know, or they want to hear a very good remix of a track they know. People typically spend a long time crafting very good remixes (or at least they do it in multiple takes). So, the way I see it, that leaves the controllerist two options: either improvise live and maybe be slightly more interesting than the original track (but likely less interesting), or build your mix into a "routine" and basically follow a script, or a series of scripts.
But, if you're following a script, you have to ask the question, "if I'm basically hitting Play on the routine and letting it go (maybe tweaking a filter or a send over the top of it), then why not just simplify things and record it to one track instead?" At that point, of course, you're right back where DJs were in 1979, only with a hell of a lot more fragile technology to worry about.
I get the novelty of being able to claim that a track is being "remixed live". But, in my sincere opinion, the whole thing is a lot of tail-chasing and you're better off putting that energy into picking the right track to play next, and in paying attention to your crowd. That will pay many, many more dividends IMO.
rs
Bookmarks