OT: Julian Assange has been arrested

[haze324]

Or the thousands of others killed over the 7 years we've been there?

And I bet you'd feel differently if you'd been born in Iraq instead of the UK.

WE?

Out of curiosity...have you been to Iraq or Afghanistan

[greatwhitedope]

WE?

Out of curiosity...have you been to Iraq or Afghanistan

Semantics

[Nicky H]

no national security was compromised past the fact that top american officials are looking stupid for making the comments they made. NONE. show me the fucking cables that give away all this top secret information. i dare you.

http://www.britainnews.net/story/716316

i hope you get bummed IRL for saying that.

Me too

[loop]

The guy has released details of key pipelines, cables and infrastructure required for national security and that's just fucking stupid.

Has he never heard of terrorism - I hope he gets bummed in jail.

mate, terrorism comes from within, humans are generally peaceful these days, we are not terorrists. It's the corporations and the fictional financial interests (which practically equals POWER over the society) who are the terrorists.

Have a thought in the last few days: I suspect that Wiki Leaks is actually an intentional disclosure of information similar to: http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread402958/pg1
WARNING: What in this posting is not 100% truth. In fact, it is no more than about 50-60% truth, the rest being there to serve certain agenda. It says a lot and is wort reading nonetheless.

I learned for this post from another post in the same forum, which is at: http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread535720/pg1
This particular thread was one of the most important things in my life by far, as that led me to the
http://lawofone.info/ and to my current perception of the world. I'm truly grateful to the universe for this and for answering my request for knowing where and who we are.

Peace and respect!

P.S. by mistake, I started a new thread http://djtechtools.com/forum/showthread.php?t=21413 which is generally on the same topic. Maybe Mods would want to merge it here ...

[Nicky H]

mate, terrorism comes from within, humans are generally peaceful these days, we are not terorrists. It's the corporations and the fictional financial interests (which practically equals POWER over the society) who are the terrorists.

Really?

[loop]

it is my belief, yes. I trust that the people and the society in 2010 have overgrown the act of agression and the warfare as a whole.

Of course, I realize that some minds are still weak and twisted, which makes them subject to manipulations. These individuals/small organizations however, are far from capable to perform a high scale act of terrorism.

I generally wish to believe in human's kindness

[Ross]

Tell me something. If a country feels assaulted enough by something revealed by Wikileaks that they want to respond with military force, do you think it will be Wikileaks they direct their anger toward?

If your comment is true, who REALLY started a war? This is the WHOLE POINT of this argument. Do you really believe that it's OK for a government to fuck people over as long as they don't get caught? It's OK for governments distort or outright fabricate the news as long as no one finds out the truth?

Did you watch that Wikileaks released video showing the 2 journalists being killed by the helicopters? The US line was that those people were armed. The 2 identified as being armed were carrying CAMERAS. 7 of them were killed, and 1 wounded. A van pulled up (with 2 children in it, as well as several adults) and they tried to help the wounded man. The helicopters opened fire again and killed the adults (who were outside of the van). The children survived. At least 12 people were killed in that single exchange, and they were NOT terrorists.

Did Wikileaks kill those people? Or the thousands of others killed over
the 7 years we've been there? Can you really justify their deaths as long as everyone keeps this loss of life secret?

I don't mind telling you that's a shitty fucking attitude. And I bet you'd feel differently if you'd been born in Iraq instead of the UK.

Calm down baby, let's put on some Barry White and lather up our ringpieces and whisper sweet nothings into eachothers ears.

That website leaked prime terrorist targets in detail, giving them everything they need to potentially cause more havoc and destruction.

Great job Assange, keep a secret a secret.

[loop]

That website leaked prime terrorist targets in detail, giving them everything they need to potentially cause more havoc and destruction.

do you really care if the so called US defense will be compromised to terrorism? I don't. I hate militaries (and lawyers, LOL).

I'd care much more about the heavy loaded public places. Places with civilians like you and me. But, you won't need any secret document to know such place - it's the bridges, tunnels, crossroads, undergrounds/subways, trains/bus stations. You name it.

The leak in question in particular, smells a lot to me. It smells like it's goal was to convert the public against WL. And very likely it may - i'm just observing your reactions. Just think about it: recently New York Times and other key medias joined WL. it's very likely that these are controlled medias, IMO. So what happens - they together did a move which would what? It effectively turns the public AGAINST WL.

PRIME TARGETS you say - that's bad, that's bad. Now let's wait and see if it will become the 9/11 pattern - could it happen that because of WL, there will be an attack. Then what - the next WAR AGAINST who? Australia - They grow Assanges there - they are enemies, let's wipe them out. You're with us?

LOL

P.S. I trully hope that what i've just typed will really remain a joke (and only a joke). even bigger nonsense would be that the society will allow it ... once more ... and then maybe again ...
calm,
fitter,
healthier and more productive
a pig
in a cage
on antibiotics.

[nem0nic]

Instead of putting on some Barry White, I think you need to turn off Fox News and put on your thinking cap.

NONE of the facilities listed in the leak you reference were secret. They could just as easily be found using that other famous terrorist tool - Google. If you had done any research at all instead of just taking a single news source at face value, you would have known that. It doesn't take a master terrorist to figure out that if you cut a trans-continental communications cable that it's going to disrupt communications. Or if you blow up a power plant that it will cease producing power. If I do something as sinister as open Google Maps and search "nuclear plants", I can see that there are 2 nuclear power plants close to Chicago (for example).

Terrorists don't need a list to find targets. They just need an IQ over 90 and an internet connection.

[Ross]

These are places like Heathrow, Gatwick, where loads of people will be... That's what Terrorism's about...