What do you mean the djm900 can’t keep tempo by them? And I know what you mean, my roommate has been pushing me towards these, but I just can’t get over the cheap imitation aspect. We talked about throwing tape over the gemini logo so I wouldn’t feel so ashamed For the price though, they look pretty awesome hopefully someone here has given them a try.
Gemini do indeed suffer from the same build quality that plagues Behringer gear, if you want something for home use they’ll probably last years. On the road, in a club or hire company deffo would not last.
For $500 a piece though they look like a pretty decent alternative to Pioneers for a home setup where you need to practice without the price.
I think I found the first obligatory “unboxing video” !
As a pure curiosity, I tried them out in a store. They crashed after 5 minutes. It may be a pure coincidence, but when it happened i was pretty shocked, you certainly don’t want that to happen to you when playing out.
I would go for some 2nd hand Pio CDJ if I were you.
Why would they bother? Pioneer obviously isnt having it’s stranglehold broken any time soon. Why would a company waste tons of capital building a solid media player, only to have it be crushed in sales by even the smallest CDJ? That’s why most alternative media players pride themselves on having “more features than CDJs” or “half the cost of CDJs.” They aren’t going to waste time and money building industry standard decks that won’t be the new industry standard, they’d rather target the budget audience, that doesn’t care if the buttons get launched into the floor after a few months.
Because if they build crap that breaks then they will have a reputation as a company that makes crap that breaks rather than being seen as a viable alternative and stand a chance of becoming a market leader in the future.
I think I can confidently say that Gemini is not going to become a market leader and time soon. I hear what you’re saying jay, but if anyone’s going to challenge pio, Gemini is not it.
I didn’t say they were going to but it’s certainly a situation they would like to be in. They don’t stand a chance unless they make better products. I don’t believe they would have anything to gain from making the cheapest stuff either since a company like behringer with greater manufacturing capability will be able to create the same for a lower price.
It doesn’t make sense for them to make gear that will die fast.
Because gear that dies fast doesn’t cost very much, and can have many features bordering on novelty. This is their USP, and their only chance of actually selling anything. They could make the CDJ-700 with high quality parts, powerful firmware, and charge $1500 for them, but nobody would buy them, because why the Hell would you buy anything that isn’t a CDJ-900/2000 in that bracket? In the cheap junk market, they actually have a chance of moving units, targeting those who want a CDJ style, but can’t afford the Pioneer ecosystem.
If they wanted to sink money into a quality product, they would throw their hat in the controller market, and try to leverage a market with infinite niches, needs, and key players, rather than the high end CDJ market, which has been absolutely unbreakable for over a decade.
It’s exactly these kind of attitudes that keep pioneer charging soo much. You only have to look at there marketing machine to realise that most of your money markets more of their stuff and pays off some super club and Roger’s free pair. There CDJ’s feel cheap yet look how much they cost, ffs we should be boycotting them on principle.