OK, so im finally dropping on some semi-serious monitors. Produce all sorts, dubsteppy stuff, hip-hop, chillout, jazz, rock, acoustic. So am leaning towards the yamaha hs80m’s for that reasons, but the krk rp8’s are used by alot of people and look cool.
I have the krk rp8’s - sounds very nice. Alot of people lean more towards the yamaha I find.
Either way, both speakers are great, but it won’t do you any good unless the room you’re producing in is sound treated properly. Especially since you mention you are wanting to do some ‘dubsteppy’ stuff, ya gotta watch out for bass traps in the room you are producing in and stuff like that.
I own the rp8’s. The consensus is true, in that they tend to over emphasize the low mids (300-700 Hz) They can be described as having a slightly “tubby” sound at high levels. I’ve learned to accommodate and adjust for that that in my mixes though. The high drivers are excellent for a sub $500 monitor. They also have HF adjustment knobs on the back if your room is too reflective, but I think they would have struck gold by also adding a LF adjust to compensate for the resonance in the cabinet. The ideal setup for the RP series is actually the RP6 and the K10s sub. That eliminates much of the low end resonance in the mains.
The entire Yamaha HS series could be rightfully described as “more accurate” than the RPs, however they can be really fatiguing to listen to for long periods of time…not unlike the NS10s they borrowed some design from. If you A/B them with the KRK stuff you will immediately notice the greater mid presence. From a purely academic standpoint, they are the more correct monitor to use…but I find that they work better as a main monitor for mixing acoustic or rock music. For most electronic styles, they sound too harsh to maintain your enthusiam while working.