What the is the price difference between the 2.3 and 2.6?
What I would do, get 8GB of RAM, get the 2.3 (if there is a ‘noticable’) difference in price from the 2.6 and get an SSD, the 2.3 + SSD will have better speed differences than the 2.6 and a HDD.
An SSD will be fairly cost effective, but the speed difference between
2.3GHz and 2.6 GHz = minor
compared to
HDD vs SSD.
It’ll run like the cats pyjamas with 2.3GHz and SSD. I’d suggest a 240GB SSD, which can be bought (depending on it’s capabilities with the MBP) for $150-200.
2.6 will only drain your battery faster when doing basic usage. You won’t notice except if you do heavy production with a load of effects.
If it’s retina i’d say go for 16gb, because the ssd is upgradable, the ram is not
Is antiglare necessary? You are using it for music, so personally, I wouldn’t bother. Same goes for the processor upgrade. For RAM, end up with 8 in the end whichever way you go. I have 4 and it runs so well, but 8 would be nicer.
I promise I’m not trying to troll here, but $2500? Jesus. I’m running 2.6.1 and FL Studio 9 with multiple vst’s on a 3 year old i3/3gb/320gb hdd/Win7 machine and it still runs really well. Just for comparison sake, there’s a 17" 1080/i7/12gb/1tb hdd/backlit/win7 laptop on Amazon for $649 right now. I would love to have an MBP, but I just can’t justify it.
It’s not plain and simple, and not everything Apple is overpriced. The Macbook Air is priced similarly to the Windows equivalents from Samsung and ASUS etc. And there is no Windows equivalent to the Mac Mini.