i’m thinking of sending a set of mine into a online dj contest. below some sets of other dj’s I read : ‘’ mixed with cd- players, NO COMPUTER SHIZZLE !!‘’.
Now I don’t know anymore if i’m gonna send mine in because it is made with traktor… what u guys think about this?
The problem is that people on cdjs or vinyl arnt going to be able to compete with someone making a studio set within ableton that uses 45 million tunes in 20 min all masterfully put together and they need to be able to compare “apples to apples” not “apples to oranges”.
don’t enter. the rules specifically say you can’t.
if you did enter and it was revealed later on you did the set on the computer then you would be disqualified and possibly get a bad name for yourself.
the only way in my opinion to survive as a software dj is to be non-confrontational and be completely upfront and open about it. we face a lot of criticism and general contempt so i find being very honest and conceding that there is a lot more skill in certain aspects of vinyl/cd based mixing but try to promote the possibilities of software is the best way.
if certain people don’t want to have anything to do with it then obviously its disappointing but they have good grounds for doing so. (dont want to open up the grand debate yet again but you have to admit that anti-software people do have some valid points)
if I’m reading the original post correctly it’s the other DJs who are saying that they haven’t used “computer shizzle” (brilliant phrase, must remember to use it more often ) not the organisers. In which case an email to clarify with the judges whether they consider mixing with Traktor to be off limits would be entirely reasonable.
Personally, I’d say that mixing live with Traktor or any other similar package where you are putting tracks together on the fly should acceptable - packages/submissions where the mix has been laboured over i.e. not in real-time wouldn’t be fair to the vinyl/CD guys. Mixing live in any format has every opportunity for disaster - and spontaneous brilliance - which is what it’s all about at the end of the day!
anyway, with too many tunes to ever convert (without the prospect of maintaining any form of life away from the machine) surely there’s going to be quite a few of us who are going to be mixing using multiple formats for some years to come?
*looks guiltily at piles of vinyl and project plan to convert that has shamelessly slipped…and slipped…and slipped again)
well it is not the problem mixing with cdj’s but i hate the fact ppl think that digital dj’ing is easilyer than mixin on tabletops or vinyl… i just prefer digital mixing bexause i have a quick overview on the crowd (on what music they react) and make more sofisticated mixes on 4 decks.
but still a good idea ! thnx
well it is really. just straight up mixing track a to track b is considerably easier on software than vinyl or cdjs. the key is to explore the potential the software offers to bring something truly special to the table.
well, that’s it what i’m talkin about, it is easier with software to mix, but cueing, loop jumping, … is the special thing that is difficult about software. and ppl don’t realize that we are doing this to.