Its a pretty interesting article, but its kind of argument about the house scene that has been talked about before
First two paragraphs
At some point in 2007, a bunch of people realised that they hadn’t been laid for the entirety of the four years they’d been listening to dubstep, and fucked off to make something that sounded like the exact opposite of it.
It began life without a name, but pretty soon music hacks realised the jig was up for dubstep because no one wanted to feel like they were trapped in a submarine in the Thames having a panic attack any more, and so “post-dubstep” was born. A few years later, and here we are: with the first British club music built on a 4x4 kick to soundtrack a T4 ident since “Where’s Your Head At”.
funny how journalism hates on everything these days, dancing, music, fun… i mean jeez… might as well stick your head in the sand. This culture is all about having fun, and if that means listening to a 2 hour set of just white noise, than hey, enjoy! everybody has PLUR t shirts and tattoos, but they really don’t grasp the true meaning of those fundamentals. Chill people!
I mean, they have to sell something, and usually, telling the bad stuff about the subject is what gets people to react. Ever wonder why very little articles ever talk about the good stuff about the scene?
some of the stuff in that article was kind of funny tho.
